# Penalizing Proposals using Classifiers for Semi-Supervised Object Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.13219 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13219/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12872/) (2020)
- [Mask R-CNN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06870/) (2017)
- [Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03144/) (2016)
- [You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02640/) (2015)
- [SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.02325/) (2015)
- [Fast R-CNN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.08083/) (2015)
- [YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.02767/) (2018)
- [Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.2524/) (2013)
- [YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.08242/) (2016)
- [MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02249/) (2019)
- [Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04252/) (2019)
- [YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08430/) (2021)
- [EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.09070/) (2019)
- [The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00982/) (2018)
- [Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01780/) (2017)
- [End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection with Soft Teacher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09018/) (2021)
- [A Simple Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04757/) (2020)
- [You Only Look at One Sequence: Rethinking Transformer in Vision through Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00666/) (2021)
- [Consistency-based Semi-supervised Active Learning: Towards Minimizing Labeling Cost](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07153/) (2019)
- [Learning Attentive Pairwise Interaction for Fine-Grained Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10191/) (2020)
- [Learning to Self-Train for Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00562/) (2019)
- [Self-EMD: Self-Supervised Object Detection without ImageNet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13677/) (2020)
- [Attention Convolutional Binary Neural Tree for Fine-Grained Visual Categorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11378/) (2019)
- [Mutual Exclusivity Loss for Semi-Supervised Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03141/) (2016)
- [Iterative Bounding Box Annotation for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00961/) (2020)
- [Faster Bounding Box Annotation for Object Detection in Indoor Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03142/) (2018)
- [Sample selection for efficient image annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04678/) (2021)
- [Semi-supervised Learning for Dense Object Detection in Retail Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02114/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Obtaining gold standard annotated data for object detection is often costly, involving human-level effort. Semi-supervised object detection algorithms solve the problem with a small amount of gold-standard labels and a large unlabelled dataset used to generate silver-standard labels. But training on the silver standard labels does not produce good results, because they are machine-generated annotations. In this work, we design a modified loss function to train on large silver standard annotated sets generated by a weak annotator. We include a confidence metric associated with the annotation as an additional term in the loss function, signifying the quality of the annotation. We test the effectiveness of our approach on various test sets and use numerous variations to compare the results with some of the current approaches to object detection. In comparison with the baseline where no confidence metric is used, we achieved a 4% gain in mAP with 25% labeled data and 10% gain in mAP with 50% labeled data by using the proposed confidence metric.