# Bias Discovery in Machine Learning Models for Mental Health

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12093 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12093/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Certifying and removing disparate impact](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.3756/) (2014)
- [Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07139/) (2016)
- [Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.05577/) (2018)
- [Does Gender Matter? Towards Fairness in Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10486/) (2019)
- [Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.10075/) (2020)
- [Conscientious Classification: A Data Scientist's Guide to Discrimination-Aware Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.09013/) (2019)
- [Exploring Racial Bias within Face Recognition via per-subject Adversarially-Enabled Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08945/) (2020)
- [An Empirical Characterization of Fair Machine Learning For Clinical Risk Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.10306/) (2020)
- [Algorithmic Fairness in Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05443/) (2020)
- [On the (im)possibility of fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07236/) (2016)
- [On the Impact of Random Seeds on the Fairness of Clinical Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06338/) (2021)
- [(Un)fairness in Post-operative Complication Prediction Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02036/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Vertical Federated Learning: A Structured Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00622/) (2022)
- [AutoPsyC: Automatic Recognition of Psychodynamic Conflicts from Semi-structured Interviews with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21911/) (2025)
- [Fairness and bias correction in machine learning for depression prediction: results from four study populations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05321/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness and bias are crucial concepts in artificial intelligence, yet they are relatively ignored in machine learning applications in clinical psychiatry. We computed fairness metrics and present bias mitigation strategies using a model trained on clinical mental health data. We collected structured data related to the admission, diagnosis, and treatment of patients in the psychiatry department of the University Medical Center Utrecht. We trained a machine learning model to predict future administrations of benzodiazepines on the basis of past data. We found that gender plays an unexpected role in the predictions-this constitutes bias. Using the AI Fairness 360 package, we implemented reweighing and discrimination-aware regularization as bias mitigation strategies, and we explored their implications for model performance. This is the first application of bias exploration and mitigation in a machine learning model trained on real clinical psychiatry data.
