# FIND:Explainable Framework for Meta-learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10362 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10362/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.04150/) (2015)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.2901/) (2013)
- [Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6806/) (2014)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11063/) (2017)
- [Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01279/) (2019)
- [Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00069/) (2018)
- [Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negatives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07623/) (2018)
- [Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.00033/) (2018)
- [Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02584/) (2019)
- [Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05386/) (2016)
- [Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.08468/) (2016)
- [Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08139/) (2018)
- [Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00614/) (2018)
- [On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02522/) (2020)
- [Explaining Black-Box Algorithms Using Probabilistic Contrastive Counterfactuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11972/) (2021)
- [Leveraging Latent Features for Local Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12698/) (2019)
- [Model-Based Counterfactual Synthesizer for Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08971/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Meta-learning in healthcare: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02877/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Meta-learning is used to efficiently enable the automatic selection of machine learning models by combining data and prior knowledge. Since the traditional meta-learning technique lacks explainability, as well as shortcomings in terms of transparency and fairness, achieving explainability for meta-learning is crucial. This paper proposes FIND, an interpretable meta-learning framework that not only can explain the recommendation results of meta-learning algorithm selection, but also provide a more complete and accurate explanation of the recommendation algorithm's performance on specific datasets combined with business scenarios. The validity and correctness of this framework have been demonstrated by extensive experiments.