# Improved Utility Analysis of Private CountSketch

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08397 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.08397/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 17 May 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [On Differential Privacy and Adaptive Data Analysis with Bounded Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05707/) (2023)
- [Fast Private Kernel Density Estimation via Locality Sensitive Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01877/) (2023)
- [Private Federated Learning with Autotuned Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10999/) (2023)
- [Distributed Differentially Private Data Analytics via Secure Sketching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00497/) (2024)
- [Private Federated Frequency Estimation: Adapting to the Hardness of the Instance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09396/) (2023)
- [DPSW-Sketch: A Differentially Private Sketch Framework for Frequency Estimation over Sliding Windows (Technical Report)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07953/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Sketching is an important tool for dealing with high-dimensional vectors that are sparse (or well-approximated by a sparse vector), especially useful in distributed, parallel, and streaming settings. It is known that sketches can be made differentially private by adding noise according to the sensitivity of the sketch, and this has been used in private analytics and federated learning settings. The post-processing property of differential privacy implies that all estimates computed from the sketch can be released within the given privacy budget. In this paper we consider the classical CountSketch, made differentially private with the Gaussian mechanism, and give an improved analysis of its estimation error. Perhaps surprisingly, the privacy-utility trade-off is essentially the best one could hope for, independent of the number of repetitions in CountSketch: The error is almost identical to the error from non-private CountSketch plus the noise needed to make the vector private in the original, high-dimensional domain.
