# Evaluating Uncertainty Calibration for Open-Set Recognition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07160 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07160/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 May 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01474/) (2016)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02136/) (2016)
- [Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02530/) (2019)
- [Towards Open Set Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06233/) (2015)
- [Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07998/) (2021)
- [Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05720/) (2018)
- [Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02680/) (2015)
- [Classification-Reconstruction Learning for Open-Set Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04246/) (2018)
- [C2AE: Class Conditioned Auto-Encoder for Open-set Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01198/) (2019)
- [Learning Placeholders for Open-Set Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15086/) (2021)
- [Hybrid Models for Open Set Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12506/) (2020)
- [The Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06557/) (2018)
- [Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13546/) (2020)
- [Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.05719/) (2021)
- [Failing to Learn: Autonomously Identifying Perception Failures for Self-driving Cars](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.00051/) (2017)
- [Place Categorization and Semantic Mapping on a Mobile Robot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.02428/) (2015)
- [An Uncertainty Estimation Framework for Probabilistic Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15007/) (2021)
- [Open-World Active Learning with Stacking Ensemble for Self-Driving Cars](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06628/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [MetaMax: Improved Open-Set Deep Neural Networks via Weibull Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10872/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite achieving enormous success in predictive accuracy for visual classification problems, deep neural networks (DNNs) suffer from providing overconfident probabilities on out-of-distribution (OOD) data. Yet, accurate uncertainty estimation is crucial for safe and reliable robot autonomy. In this paper, we evaluate popular calibration techniques for open-set conditions in a way that is distinctly different from the conventional evaluation of calibration methods on OOD data. Our results show that closed-set DNN calibration approaches are much less effective for open-set recognition, which highlights the need to develop new DNN calibration methods to address this problem.
