# What do we Really Know about State of the Art NER?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.00034 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00034/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 30 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07125/) (2019)
- [Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11932/) (2019)
- [Named Entity Recognition with Bidirectional LSTM-CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.08308/) (2015)
- [Named Entity Recognition as Dependency Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07150/) (2020)
- [Robustness Gym: Unifying the NLP Evaluation Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04840/) (2021)
- [Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11508/) (2019)
- [We Need to Talk About Random Splits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00636/) (2020)
- [SpanNER: Named Entity Re-/Recognition as Span Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00641/) (2021)
- [Universal Dependency Parsing from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.10457/) (2019)
- [Fast and Accurate Entity Recognition with Iterated Dilated Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.02098/) (2017)
- [Empirical Analysis of Unlabeled Entity Problem in Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.05426/) (2020)
- [RockNER: A Simple Method to Create Adversarial Examples for Evaluating the Robustness of Named Entity Recognition Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05620/) (2021)
- [Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.06854/) (2020)
- [Generalisation in Named Entity Recognition: A Quantitative Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.02877/) (2017)
- [NoiseQA: Challenge Set Evaluation for User-Centric Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08345/) (2021)
- [Better Feature Integration for Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05316/) (2021)
- [Context-aware Adversarial Training for Name Regularity Bias in Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.11610/) (2021)
- [BERT-Defense: A Probabilistic Model Based on BERT to Combat Cognitively Inspired Orthographic Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01452/) (2021)
- [Why Comparing Single Performance Scores Does Not Allow to Draw Conclusions About Machine Learning Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09578/) (2018)
- [Contextualized Embeddings in Named-Entity Recognition: An Empirical Study on Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08053/) (2020)
- [Entity-Switched Datasets: An Approach to Auditing the In-Domain Robustness of Named Entity Recognition Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04123/) (2020)
- [Robust Lexical Features for Improved Neural Network Named-Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03489/) (2018)
- [Named Entity Recognition -- Is there a glass ceiling?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02403/) (2019)
- [To BERT or Not to BERT: Comparing Task-specific and Task-agnostic Semi-Supervised Approaches for Sequence Tagging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14042/) (2020)
- [TMR: Evaluating NER Recall on Tough Mentions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12312/) (2021)
- [Larger-Context Tagging: When and Why Does It Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04434/) (2021)
- [A Novel Challenge Set for Hebrew Morphological Disambiguation and Diacritics Restoration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02864/) (2020)
- [Locally-Contextual Nonlinear CRFs for Sequence Labeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16210/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [ATCO2 corpus: A Large-Scale Dataset for Research on Automatic Speech Recognition and Natural Language Understanding of Air Traffic Control Communications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04054/) (2022)
- [Cross-Lingual Transfer Robustness to Lower-Resource Languages on Adversarial Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20056/) (2024)
- [Konooz: Multi-domain Multi-dialect Corpus for Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12615/) (2025)
- [A Multilingual Evaluation of NER Robustness to Adversarial Inputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18933/) (2023)
- [CebuaNER: A New Baseline Cebuano Named Entity Recognition Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00679/) (2023)
- [Answer Candidate Type Selection: Text-to-Text Language Model for Closed Book Question Answering Meets Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07008/) (2023)
- [Self-Improving-Leaderboard(SIL): A Call for Real-World Centric Natural Language Processing Leaderboards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10888/) (2023)
- [Human-Annotated NER Dataset for the Kyrgyz Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19109/) (2025)
- [Leveraging Cross-Lingual Transfer Learning in Spoken Named Entity Recognition Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01310/) (2023)
- [Towards a Diagnostic and Predictive Evaluation Methodology for Sequence Labeling Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12759/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Named Entity Recognition (NER) is a well researched NLP task and is widely used in real world NLP scenarios. NER research typically focuses on the creation of new ways of training NER, with relatively less emphasis on resources and evaluation. Further, state of the art (SOTA) NER models, trained on standard datasets, typically report only a single performance measure (F-score) and we don't really know how well they do for different entity types and genres of text, or how robust are they to new, unseen entities. In this paper, we perform a broad evaluation of NER using a popular dataset, that takes into consideration various text genres and sources constituting the dataset at hand. Additionally, we generate six new adversarial test sets through small perturbations in the original test set, replacing select entities while retaining the context. We also train and test our models on randomly generated train/dev/test splits followed by an experiment where the models are trained on a select set of genres but tested genres not seen in training. These comprehensive evaluation strategies were performed using three SOTA NER models. Based on our results, we recommend some useful reporting practices for NER researchers, that could help in providing a better understanding of a SOTA model's performance in future.
