# Inferring Implicit Relations in Complex Questions with Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13778 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.13778/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 41 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2022.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03822/) (2018)
- [LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08239/) (2022)
- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00114/) (2021)
- [Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02235/) (2021)
- [How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08910/) (2020)
- [GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06745/) (2022)
- [Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08633/) (2021)
- [Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11990/) (2022)
- [UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00700/) (2020)
- [The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06643/) (2018)
- [QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06378/) (2021)
- [Transformers as Soft Reasoners over Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05867/) (2020)
- [Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08387/) (2021)
- [Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06481/) (2017)
- [Break It Down: A Question Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.11770/) (2020)
- [Multi-hop Reading Comprehension through Question Decomposition and Rescoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02916/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Question Decomposition for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09758/) (2020)
- [CommonsenseQA 2.0: Exposing the Limits of AI through Gamification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05320/) (2022)
- [UNICORN on RAINBOW: A Universal Commonsense Reasoning Model on a New Multitask Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.13009/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15402/) (2023)
- [Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11504/) (2023)
- [BoardgameQA: A Dataset for Natural Language Reasoning with Contradictory Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07934/) (2023)
- [Natural Language Deduction with Incomplete Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00614/) (2022)
- [An Evaluation of Large Language Models in Bioinformatics Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13714/) (2024)
- [Reading Between the Dots: Decoding Hidden Computation across Filler Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03502/) (2026)
- [Dense Paraphrasing for Textual Enrichment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11563/) (2022)
- [On Exploring the Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00353/) (2023)
- [Gradually Excavating External Knowledge for Implicit Complex Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08148/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A prominent challenge for modern language understanding systems is the ability to answer implicit reasoning questions, where the required reasoning steps for answering the question are not mentioned in the text explicitly. In this work, we investigate why current models struggle with implicit reasoning question answering (QA) tasks, by decoupling inference of reasoning steps from their execution. We define a new task of implicit relation inference and construct a benchmark, IMPLICITRELATIONS, where given a question, a model should output a list of concept-relation pairs, where the relations describe the implicit reasoning steps required for answering the question. Using IMPLICITRELATIONS, we evaluate models from the GPT-3 family and find that, while these models struggle on the implicit reasoning QA task, they often succeed at inferring implicit relations. This suggests that the challenge in implicit reasoning questions does not stem from the need to plan a reasoning strategy alone, but to do it while also retrieving and reasoning over relevant information.