# Estimating the Personality of White-Box Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12000 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12000/

## Key facts

- Cited by 48 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.02860/) (2019)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Books](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.06724/) (2015)
- [StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09456/) (2020)
- [CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00359/) (2019)
- [The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01326/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00161/) (2019)
- [Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03035/) (2019)
- [Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Personality Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03628/) (2019)
- [Learning Structured Text Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09207/) (2017)
- [Automatic Extraction of Personality from Text: Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09916/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 48)

- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16388/) (2023)
- [PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02547/) (2023)
- [From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18231/) (2024)
- [InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17976/) (2023)
- [Personality Traits in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00184/) (2023)
- [Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.11457/) (2024)
- [From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03563/) (2024)
- [Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14703/) (2024)
- [Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03656/) (2023)
- [Virtual Personas for Language Models via an Anthology of Backstories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06576/) (2024)
- [BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16491/) (2024)
- [Self-Assessment Tests are Unreliable Measures of LLM Personality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08163/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Can Infer Psychological Dispositions of Social Media Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08631/) (2023)
- [Who is ChatGPT? Benchmarking LLMs' Psychological Portrayal Using PsychoBench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01386/) (2023)
- [Challenging the Validity of Personality Tests for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05297/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17675/) (2024)
- [Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07115/) (2024)
- [ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04214/) (2024)
- [On the Trustworthiness Landscape of State-of-the-art Generative Models: A Survey and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16680/) (2023)
- [LMLPA: Language Model Linguistic Personality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17632/) (2024)
- [The Effects of Embodiment and Personality Expression on Learning in LLM-based Educational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10993/) (2024)
- [Self-assessment, Exhibition, and Recognition: a Review of Personality in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17624/) (2024)
- [Identifying Multiple Personalities in Large Language Models with External Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14805/) (2024)
- [Humanizing LLMs: A Survey of Psychological Measurements with Tools, Datasets, and Human-Agent Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00049/) (2025)
- [How Personality Traits Shape LLM Risk-Taking Behaviour](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04735/) (2025)
- [Improving Language Model Personas via Rationalization with Psychological Scaffolds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17993/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Can Infer Personality from Free-Form User Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13052/) (2024)
- [HLB: Benchmarking LLMs' Humanlikeness in Language Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15890/) (2024)
- [UPLex: Fine-Grained Personality Control in Large Language Models via Unsupervised Lexical Modulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16582/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Technology for open-ended language generation, a key application of artificial intelligence, has advanced to a great extent in recent years. Large-scale language models, which are trained on large corpora of text, are being used in a wide range of applications everywhere, from virtual assistants to conversational bots. While these language models output fluent text, existing research shows that these models can and do capture human biases. Many of these biases, especially those that could potentially cause harm, are being well-investigated. On the other hand, studies that infer and change human personality traits inherited by these models have been scarce or non-existent. Our work seeks to address this gap by exploring the personality traits of several large-scale language models designed for open-ended text generation and the datasets used for training them. We build on the popular Big Five factors and develop robust methods that quantify the personality traits of these models and their underlying datasets. In particular, we trigger the models with a questionnaire designed for personality assessment and subsequently classify the text responses into quantifiable traits using a Zero-shot classifier. Our estimation scheme sheds light on an important anthropomorphic element found in such AI models and can help stakeholders decide how they should be applied as well as how society could perceive them. Additionally, we examined approaches to alter these personalities, adding to our understanding of how AI models can be adapted to specific contexts.