# DeFTA: A Plug-and-Play Decentralized Replacement for FedAvg

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02632 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02632/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02189/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning with Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00582/) (2018)
- [Adaptive Federated Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00295/) (2020)
- [Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08935/) (2019)
- [Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01046/) (2019)
- [How To Backdoor Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00459/) (2018)
- [Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Rates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01498/) (2018)
- [Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03604/) (2018)
- [Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02527/) (2016)
- [Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02891/) (2019)
- [iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02610/) (2020)
- [A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.10422/) (2020)
- [Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12101/) (2019)
- [Decentralized Stochastic Optimization and Gossip Algorithms with Compressed Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00340/) (2019)
- [Revisiting Distributed Synchronous SGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05800/) (2017)
- [D2: Decentralized Training over Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.07068/) (2018)
- [BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06731/) (2019)
- [Blockchained On-Device Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.03949/) (2018)
- [Robust Federated Learning in a Heterogeneous Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.06629/) (2019)
- [Peer-to-peer Federated Learning on Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.11173/) (2019)
- [Decentralized Collaborative Learning of Personalized Models over Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05202/) (2016)
- [Slow and Stale Gradients Can Win the Race: Error-Runtime Trade-offs in Distributed SGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01113/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is identified as a crucial enabler for large-scale distributed machine learning (ML) without the need for local raw dataset sharing, substantially reducing privacy concerns and alleviating the isolated data problem. In reality, the prosperity of FL is largely due to a centralized framework called FedAvg, in which workers are in charge of model training and servers are in control of model aggregation. However, FedAvg's centralized worker-server architecture has raised new concerns, be it the low scalability of the cluster, the risk of data leakage, and the failure or even defection of the central server. To overcome these problems, we propose Decentralized Federated Trusted Averaging (DeFTA), a decentralized FL framework that serves as a plug-and-play replacement for FedAvg, instantly bringing better security, scalability, and fault-tolerance to the federated learning process after installation. In principle, it fundamentally resolves the above-mentioned issues from an architectural perspective without compromises or tradeoffs, primarily consisting of a new model aggregating formula with theoretical performance analysis, and a decentralized trust system (DTS) to greatly improve system robustness. Note that since DeFTA is an alternative to FedAvg at the framework level, textitprevalent algorithms published for FedAvg can be also utilized in DeFTA with ease. Extensive experiments on six datasets and six basic models suggest that DeFTA not only has comparable performance with FedAvg in a more realistic setting, but also achieves great resilience even when 66% of workers are malicious. Furthermore, we also present an asynchronous variant of DeFTA to endow it with more powerful usability.