# A Manifold View of Adversarial Risk

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13277 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13277/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08573/) (2019)
- [Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.08144/) (2016)
- [Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12152/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Training for Free!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12843/) (2019)
- [Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.11569/) (2020)
- [Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13736/) (2019)
- [Neural Network Dynamics for Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Model-Free Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.02596/) (2017)
- [Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.09665/) (2019)
- [Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03593/) (2020)
- [Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.00740/) (2018)
- [Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10716/) (2020)
- [Is Robustness the Cost of Accuracy? -- A Comprehensive Study on the Robustness of 18 Deep Image Classification Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.01688/) (2018)
- [When NAS Meets Robustness: In Search of Robust Architectures against Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10695/) (2019)
- [Adversarial vulnerability for any classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08686/) (2018)
- [A Boundary Tilting Persepective on the Phenomenon of Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.07690/) (2016)
- [Dual Manifold Adversarial Robustness: Defense against Lp and non-Lp Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02470/) (2020)
- [On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04681/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Learning Probabilistic Topological Representations Using Discrete Morse Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01742/) (2022)
- [Enhancing Modality-Agnostic Representations via Meta-Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04308/) (2023)
- [When Flatness Does (Not) Guarantee Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14231/) (2025)
- [Adversarial Vulnerability as a Consequence of On-Manifold Inseparibility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06921/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The adversarial risk of a machine learning model has been widely studied. Most previous works assume that the data lies in the whole ambient space. We propose to take a new angle and take the manifold assumption into consideration. Assuming data lies in a manifold, we investigate two new types of adversarial risk, the normal adversarial risk due to perturbation along normal direction, and the in-manifold adversarial risk due to perturbation within the manifold. We prove that the classic adversarial risk can be bounded from both sides using the normal and in-manifold adversarial risks. We also show with a surprisingly pessimistic case that the standard adversarial risk can be nonzero even when both normal and in-manifold risks are zero. We finalize the paper with empirical studies supporting our theoretical results. Our results suggest the possibility of improving the robustness of a classifier by only focusing on the normal adversarial risk.
