# Can Prompt Probe Pretrained Language Models? Understanding the Invisible Risks from a Causal View

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12258 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12258/

## Key facts

- Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15723/) (2020)
- [How Can We Know What Language Models Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12543/) (2019)
- [Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01007/) (2019)
- [A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12327/) (2020)
- [Counterfactual Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06856/) (2017)
- [GPT Understands, Too](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10385/) (2021)
- [Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.09301/) (2018)
- [Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06599/) (2021)
- [Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01017/) (2021)
- [What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.13528/) (2019)
- [Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recall](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05240/) (2021)
- [ERNIE 3.0: Large-scale Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02137/) (2021)
- [AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15980/) (2020)
- [Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02744/) (2017)
- [Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00505/) (2019)
- [Visually Grounded Reasoning across Languages and Cultures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13238/) (2021)
- [Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00725/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.12009/) (2020)
- [oLMpics -- On what Language Model Pre-training Captures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13283/) (2019)
- [X-FACTR: Multilingual Factual Knowledge Retrieval from Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06189/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02083/) (2023)
- [Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11504/) (2023)
- [Give Us the Facts: Enhancing Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Fact-aware Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11489/) (2023)
- [The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01967/) (2023)
- [Give Me the Facts! A Survey on Factual Knowledge Probing in Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16570/) (2023)
- [Neuro-Symbolic Procedural Planning with Commonsense Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02928/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models and Causal Inference in Collaboration: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09606/) (2024)
- [The Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07616/) (2023)
- [Retentive or Forgetful? Diving into the Knowledge Memorizing Mechanism of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09144/) (2023)
- [A Causal Explainable Guardrails for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04160/) (2024)
- [Context Variance Evaluation of Pretrained Language Models for Prompt-based Biomedical Knowledge Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10265/) (2022)
- [A Review of the Role of Causality in Developing Trustworthy AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06975/) (2023)
- [StructEval: Deepen and Broaden Large Language Model Assessment via Structured Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03281/) (2024)
- [Causality-aware Concept Extraction based on Knowledge-guided Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01876/) (2023)
- [Towards Robust NLG Bias Evaluation with Syntactically-diverse Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.01700/) (2022)
- [Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05967/) (2025)
- [Comparing Template-based and Template-free Language Model Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00123/) (2024)
- [MixPro: Simple yet Effective Data Augmentation for Prompt-based Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09402/) (2023)
- [Why Don't Prompt-Based Fairness Metrics Correlate?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05918/) (2024)
- [On Entity Identification in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02701/) (2025)
- [Test-time Augmentation for Factual Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17121/) (2023)
- [UniArk: Improving Generalisation and Consistency for Factual Knowledge Extraction through Debiasing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01253/) (2024)
- [CRAT: A Multi-Agent Framework for Causality-Enhanced Reflective and Retrieval-Augmented Translation with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21067/) (2024)
- [Causal MAS: A Survey of Large Language Model Architectures for Discovery and Effect Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00987/) (2025)
- [A Unified Causal View of Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06220/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Evaluation of Semantic Relation Knowledge of Pretrained Language Models and Humans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01131/) (2024)
- [Three tiers of computation in transformers and in brain architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04848/) (2025)
- [Causal Intervention-based Prompt Debiasing for Event Argument Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01561/) (2022)
- [Psychologically-Inspired Causal Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01764/) (2023)
- [Inducing Causal Structure for Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12888/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt-based probing has been widely used in evaluating the abilities of pretrained language models (PLMs). Unfortunately, recent studies have discovered such an evaluation may be inaccurate, inconsistent and unreliable. Furthermore, the lack of understanding its inner workings, combined with its wide applicability, has the potential to lead to unforeseen risks for evaluating and applying PLMs in real-world applications. To discover, understand and quantify the risks, this paper investigates the prompt-based probing from a causal view, highlights three critical biases which could induce biased results and conclusions, and proposes to conduct debiasing via causal intervention. This paper provides valuable insights for the design of unbiased datasets, better probing frameworks and more reliable evaluations of pretrained language models. Furthermore, our conclusions also echo that we need to rethink the criteria for identifying better pretrained language models. We openly released the source code and data at https://github.com/c-box/causalEval.
