# Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10748 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10748/

## Key facts

- Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Data Scarcity in Recommendation Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10073/) (2023)
- [Detectors for Safe and Reliable LLMs: Implementations, Uses, and Limitations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06009/) (2024)
- [Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08157/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05284/) (2023)
- [ARAIDA: Analogical Reasoning-Augmented Interactive Data Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11912/) (2024)
- [Human-in-the-Loop Synthetic Text Data Inspection with Provenance Tracking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18881/) (2024)
- [Decentralising LLM Alignment: A Case for Context, Pluralism, and Participation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08858/) (2025)
- [Automotive Perception Software Development: An Empirical Investigation into Data, Annotation, and Ecosystem Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05947/) (2023)
- [Improving Label Error Detection and Elimination with Uncertainty Quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09602/) (2024)
- [Surveys Considered Harmful? Reflecting on the Use of Surveys in AI Research, Development, and Governance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01458/) (2024)
- [Attention to Non-Adopters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15951/) (2025)
- [Model-in-the-Loop (MILO): Accelerating Multimodal AI Data Annotation with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.10702/) (2024)
- [KnowledgeShovel: An AI-in-the-Loop Document Annotation System for Scientific Knowledge Base Construction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02830/) (2022)
- [Making Data Work Count](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18046/) (2023)
- [Reconfiguring Participatory Design to Resist AI Realism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03245/) (2024)
- [A Taxonomy of Challenges to Curating Fair Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06407/) (2024)
- [The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11318/) (2026)
- [How Hyper-Datafication Impacts the Sustainability Costs in Frontier AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00056/) (2026)
- [A Culturally-Aware Tool for Crowdworkers: Leveraging Chronemics to Support Diverse Work Styles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.07838/) (2024)
- [Intuitions of Machine Learning Researchers about Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00902/) (2025)
- [Can Data Work be Reparative?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09408/) (2026)
- [AI systems and the reproduction of (standard) language ideologies in World Englishes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.28528/) (2026)
- [What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10431/) (2026)
- [CAST: Closed-form Analytic Semantic Transfer for Zero-Shot Classifier Extension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13751/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper present the practice of data annotation from the perspective of the annotators. Data is fundamental to ML models. This paper investigates the work practices concerning data annotation as performed in the industry, in India. Previous investigations have largely focused on annotator subjectivity, bias and efficiency. We present a wider perspective of the data annotation, following a grounded approach, we conducted three sets of interviews with 25 annotators, 10 industry experts and 12 ML practitioners. Our results show that the work of annotators is dictated by the interests, priorities and values of others above their station. More than technical, we contend that data annotation is a systematic exercise of power through organizational structure and practice. We propose a set of implications for how we can cultivate and encourage better practice to balance the tension between the need for high quality data at low cost and the annotator aspiration for well being, career perspective, and active participation in building the AI dream.