# iSEA: An Interactive Pipeline for Semantic Error Analysis of NLP Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04408 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04408/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05426/) (2017)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01007/) (2019)
- [Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02324/) (2018)
- [TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12421/) (2020)
- [TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05271/) (2018)
- [Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.01713/) (2016)
- [Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12265/) (2020)
- [Assessing Social and Intersectional Biases in Contextualized Word Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.01485/) (2019)
- [The Language Interpretability Tool: Extensible, Interactive Visualizations and Analysis for NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.05122/) (2020)
- [Robustness Gym: Unifying the NLP Evaluation Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04840/) (2021)
- [FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05419/) (2019)
- [Automated Data Slicing for Model Validation:A Big data - AI Integration Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06068/) (2018)
- [Do Convolutional Neural Networks Learn Class Hierarchy?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06501/) (2017)
- [Manifold: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Interpretation and Diagnosis of Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.00196/) (2018)
- [Stochastic Answer Networks for Machine Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03556/) (2017)
- [CrossCheck: Rapid, Reproducible, and Interpretable Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07993/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Increasing Diversity While Maintaining Accuracy: Text Data Generation with Large Language Models and Human Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04140/) (2023)
- [SEAL : Interactive Tool for Systematic Error Analysis and Labeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05839/) (2022)
- [VeriLLMed: Interactive Visual Debugging of Medical Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23356/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Error analysis in NLP models is essential to successful model development and deployment. One common approach for diagnosing errors is to identify subpopulations in the dataset where the model produces the most errors. However, existing approaches typically define subpopulations based on pre-defined features, which requires users to form hypotheses of errors in advance. To complement these approaches, we propose iSEA, an Interactive Pipeline for Semantic Error Analysis in NLP Models, which automatically discovers semantically-grounded subpopulations with high error rates in the context of a human-in-the-loop interactive system. iSEA enables model developers to learn more about their model errors through discovered subpopulations, validate the sources of errors through interactive analysis on the discovered subpopulations, and test hypotheses about model errors by defining custom subpopulations. The tool supports semantic descriptions of error-prone subpopulations at the token and concept level, as well as pre-defined higher-level features. Through use cases and expert interviews, we demonstrate how iSEA can assist error understanding and analysis.