# Flexible variable selection in the presence of missing data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12989 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12989/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.04409/) (2015)
- [Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02351/) (2016)
- [Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1404.5609/) (2014)
- [Efficient nonparametric statistical inference on population feature importance using Shapley values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09481/) (2020)
- [A general framework for inference on algorithm-agnostic variable importance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03683/) (2020)
- [Robust inference with knockoffs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03896/) (2018)
- [Controlling false discoveries in high-dimensional situations: Boosting with stability selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.1285/) (2014)
- [On Inverse Probability Weighting for Nonmonotone Missing at Random Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.5310/) (2014)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [AICO: Feature Significance Tests for Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23396/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In many applications, it is of interest to identify a parsimonious set of features, or panel, from multiple candidates that achieves a desired level of performance in predicting a response. This task is often complicated in practice by missing data arising from the sampling design or other random mechanisms. Most recent work on variable selection in missing data contexts relies in some part on a finite-dimensional statistical model, e.g., a generalized or penalized linear model. In cases where this model is misspecified, the selected variables may not all be truly scientifically relevant and can result in panels with suboptimal classification performance. To address this limitation, we propose a nonparametric variable selection algorithm combined with multiple imputation to develop flexible panels in the presence of missing-at-random data. We outline strategies based on the proposed algorithm that achieve control of commonly used error rates. Through simulations, we show that our proposal has good operating characteristics and results in panels with higher classification and variable selection performance compared to several existing penalized regression approaches in cases where a generalized linear model is misspecified. Finally, we use the proposed method to develop biomarker panels for separating pancreatic cysts with differing malignancy potential in a setting where complicated missingness in the biomarkers arose due to limited specimen volumes.
