# Asyncval: A Toolkit for Asynchronously Validating Dense Retriever Checkpoints during Training

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12510 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12510/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09268/) (2016)
- [ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12832/) (2020)
- [Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00808/) (2020)
- [RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08191/) (2020)
- [Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06467/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05540/) (2021)
- [RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07367/) (2021)
- [Condenser: a Pre-training Architecture for Dense Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08253/) (2021)
- [Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negatives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08051/) (2021)
- [Improving Efficient Neural Ranking Models with Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02666/) (2020)
- [PAIR: Leveraging Passage-Centric Similarity Relation for Improving Dense Passage Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06027/) (2021)
- [Improving Query Representations for Dense Retrieval with Pseudo Relevance Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13454/) (2021)
- [RepBERT: Contextualized Text Embeddings for First-Stage Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.15498/) (2020)
- [Complementing Lexical Retrieval with Semantic Residual Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13969/) (2020)
- [Pseudo Relevance Feedback with Deep Language Models and Dense Retrievers: Successes and Pitfalls](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11044/) (2021)
- [A Proposed Conceptual Framework for a Representational Approach to Information Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01529/) (2021)
- [Dealing with Typos for BERT-based Passage Retrieval and Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.12139/) (2021)
- [Improving Query Representations for Dense Retrieval with Pseudo Relevance Feedback: A Reproducibility Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06400/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06600/) (2025)
- [CharacterBERT and Self-Teaching for Improving the Robustness of Dense Retrievers on Queries with Typos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00716/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The process of model checkpoint validation refers to the evaluation of the performance of a model checkpoint executed on a held-out portion of the training data while learning the hyperparameters of the model, and is used to avoid over-fitting and determine when the model has converged so as to stop training. A simple and efficient strategy to validate deep learning checkpoints is the addition of validation loops to execute during training. However, the validation of dense retrievers (DR) checkpoints is not as trivial -- and the addition of validation loops is not efficient. This is because, in order to accurately evaluate the performance of a DR checkpoint, the whole document corpus needs to be encoded into vectors using the current checkpoint before any actual retrieval operation for checkpoint validation can be performed. This corpus encoding process can be very time-consuming if the document corpus contains millions of documents (e.g., 8.8m for MS MARCO and 21m for Natural Questions). Thus, a naive use of validation loops during training will significantly increase training time. To address this issue, in this demo paper, we propose Asyncval: a Python-based toolkit for efficiently validating DR checkpoints during training. Instead of pausing the training loop for validating DR checkpoints, Asyncval decouples the validation loop from the training loop, uses another GPU to automatically validate new DR checkpoints and thus permits to perform validation asynchronously from training. Asyncval also implements a range of different corpus subset sampling strategies for validating DR checkpoints; these strategies allow to further speed up the validation process. We provide an investigation of these methods in terms of their impact on validation time and validation fidelity. Asyncval is made available as an open-source project at https://github.com/ielab/asyncval.