# Reinforcing Local Feature Representation for Weakly-Supervised Dense Crowd Counting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.10681 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.10681/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10062/) (2018)
- [Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.01050/) (2018)
- [Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03684/) (2019)
- [Rethinking Counting and Localization in Crowds:A Purely Point-Based Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.12746/) (2021)
- [NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03360/) (2020)
- [Distribution Matching for Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13077/) (2020)
- [JHU-CROWD++: Large-Scale Crowd Counting Dataset and A Benchmark Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03597/) (2020)
- [TransCrowd: weakly-supervised crowd counting with transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09116/) (2021)
- [Crowd Counting and Density Estimation by Trellis Encoder-Decoder Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00853/) (2019)
- [Perspective-Guided Convolution Networks for Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06966/) (2019)
- [ADCrowdNet: An Attention-injective Deformable Convolutional Network for Crowd Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.11968/) (2018)
- [CNN-based Cascaded Multi-task Learning of High-level Prior and Density Estimation for Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.09605/) (2017)
- [Spatial Uncertainty-Aware Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13271/) (2021)
- [Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting via Self-Training on Surrogate Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03207/) (2020)
- [Counting with Focus for Free](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12206/) (2019)
- [Towards Using Count-level Weak Supervision for Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00164/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [RGB-T Multi-Modal Crowd Counting Based on Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03033/) (2023)
- [Counting Like Human: Anthropoid Crowd Counting on Modeling the Similarity of Objects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.02248/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Fully-supervised crowd counting is a laborious task due to the large amounts of annotations. Few works focus on weekly-supervised crowd counting, where only the global crowd numbers are available for training. The main challenge of weekly-supervised crowd counting is the lack of local supervision information. To address this problem, we propose a self-adaptive feature similarity learning (SFSL) network and a global-local consistency (GLC) loss to reinforce local feature representation. We introduce a feature vector which represents the unbiased feature estimation of persons. The network updates the feature vector self-adaptively and utilizes the feature similarity for the regression of crowd numbers. Besides, the proposed GLC loss leverages the consistency between the network estimations from global and local areas. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method based on different backbones narrows the gap between weakly-supervised and fully-supervised dense crowd counting.