# Who Are the Best Adopters? User Selection Model for Free Trial Item Promotion

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09508 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09508/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Neural Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.05031/) (2017)
- [Session-based Recommendations with Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06939/) (2015)
- [Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.08108/) (2019)
- [Session-based Recommendation with Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00855/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02371/) (2018)
- [Top-K Off-Policy Correction for a REINFORCE Recommender System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02353/) (2018)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large Discrete Action Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.07679/) (2015)
- [Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09459/) (2021)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Page-wise Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.02343/) (2018)
- [Real-Time Bidding by Reinforcement Learning in Display Advertising](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.02490/) (2017)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Sepsis Treatment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09602/) (2017)
- [Recommendations with Negative Feedback via Pairwise Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.06501/) (2018)
- [The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.13286/) (2019)
- [Real-Time Bidding with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Display Advertising](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09756/) (2018)
- [Reinforcement Learning to Rank in E-Commerce Search Engine: Formalization, Analysis, and Application](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.00710/) (2018)
- [Large-scale Interactive Recommendation with Tree-structured Policy Gradient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.05869/) (2018)
- [Adaptive Greedy versus Non-adaptive Greedy for Influence Maximization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08164/) (2019)
- [MarlRank: Multi-agent Reinforced Learning to Rank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06859/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the increasingly fierce market competition, offering a free trial has become a potent stimuli strategy to promote products and attract users. By providing users with opportunities to experience goods without charge, a free trial makes adopters know more about products and thus encourages their willingness to buy. However, as the critical point in the promotion process, finding the proper adopters is rarely explored. Empirically winnowing users by their static demographic attributes is feasible but less effective, neglecting their personalized preferences. To dynamically match the products with the best adopters, in this work, we propose a novel free trial user selection model named SMILE, which is based on reinforcement learning (RL) where an agent actively selects specific adopters aiming to maximize the profit after free trials. Specifically, we design a tree structure to reformulate the action space, which allows us to select adopters from massive user space efficiently. The experimental analysis on three datasets demonstrates the proposed model's superiority and elucidates why reinforcement learning and tree structure can improve performance. Our study demonstrates technical feasibility for constructing a more robust and intelligent user selection model and guides for investigating more marketing promotion strategies.
