# CLS: Cross Labeling Supervision for Semi-Supervised Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08502 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08502/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Wide Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07146/) (2016)
- [RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13719/) (2019)
- [FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07685/) (2020)
- [MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02249/) (2019)
- [Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04252/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12848/) (2019)
- [Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06872/) (2018)
- [Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02242/) (2016)
- [Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03976/) (2017)
- [Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02983/) (2019)
- [Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross Pseudo Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01226/) (2021)
- [Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04586/) (2016)
- [How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.04215/) (2019)
- [Meta Pseudo Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.10580/) (2020)
- [In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06329/) (2021)
- [WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.02862/) (2017)
- [Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.02672/) (2015)
- [Learning with Pseudo-Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.4864/) (2014)
- [NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07387/) (2019)
- [Dual Student: Breaking the Limits of the Teacher in Semi-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01804/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning by bridging high and low-confidence predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07509/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

It is well known that the success of deep neural networks is greatly attributed to large-scale labeled datasets. However, it can be extremely time-consuming and laborious to collect sufficient high-quality labeled data in most practical applications. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) provides an effective solution to reduce the cost of labeling by simultaneously leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. In this work, we present Cross Labeling Supervision (CLS), a framework that generalizes the typical pseudo-labeling process. Based on FixMatch, where a pseudo label is generated from a weakly-augmented sample to teach the prediction on a strong augmentation of the same input sample, CLS allows the creation of both pseudo and complementary labels to support both positive and negative learning. To mitigate the confirmation bias of self-labeling and boost the tolerance to false labels, two different initialized networks with the same structure are trained simultaneously. Each network utilizes high-confidence labels from the other network as additional supervision signals. During the label generation phase, adaptive sample weights are assigned to artificial labels according to their prediction confidence. The sample weight plays two roles: quantify the generated labels' quality and reduce the disruption of inaccurate labels on network training. Experimental results on the semi-supervised classification task show that our framework outperforms existing approaches by large margins on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets.