# IF-City: Intelligible Fair City Planning to Measure, Explain and Mitigate Inequality

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07349 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07349/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2022.

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [IRIS: Interpretable Rubric-Informed Segmentation for Action Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09097/) (2023)
- [Diagrammatization and Abduction to Improve AI Interpretability With Domain-Aligned Explanations for Medical Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01241/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Powered Intelligent Urban Agents: Concepts, Capabilities, and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.00914/) (2025)
- [Urbanite: A Dataflow-Based Framework for Human-AI Interactive Alignment in Urban Visual Analytics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07390/) (2025)
- [VA-Blueprint: Uncovering Building Blocks for Visual Analytics System Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07497/) (2025)
- [Exploring Urban Factors with Autoencoders: Relationship Between Static and Dynamic Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06167/) (2025)
- [Transferable XAI: Relating Understanding Across Domains with Explanation Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13675/) (2026)
- [Rules or Weights? Comparing User Understanding of Explainable AI Techniques with the Cognitive XAI-Adaptive Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19620/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the increasing pervasiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI), many visual analytics tools have been proposed to examine fairness, but they mostly focus on data scientist users. Instead, tackling fairness must be inclusive and involve domain experts with specialized tools and workflows. Thus, domain-specific visualizations are needed for algorithmic fairness. Furthermore, while much work on AI fairness has focused on predictive decisions, less has been done for fair allocation and planning, which require human expertise and iterative design to integrate myriad constraints. We propose the Intelligible Fair Allocation (IF-Alloc) Framework that leverages explanations of causal attribution (Why), contrastive (Why Not) and counterfactual reasoning (What If, How To) to aid domain experts to assess and alleviate unfairness in allocation problems. We apply the framework to fair urban planning for designing cities that provide equal access to amenities and benefits for diverse resident types. Specifically, we propose an interactive visual tool, Intelligible Fair City Planner (IF-City), to help urban planners to perceive inequality across groups, identify and attribute sources of inequality, and mitigate inequality with automatic allocation simulations and constraint-satisfying recommendations. We demonstrate and evaluate the usage and usefulness of IF-City on a real neighborhood in New York City, US, with practicing urban planners from multiple countries, and discuss generalizing our findings, application, and framework to other use cases and applications of fair allocation.