# Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Demography

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01013 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01013/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.07524/) (2016)
- [Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05144/) (2017)
- [Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08452/) (2016)
- [On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.06883/) (2019)
- [A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning: a Big Data -- AI Integration Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03402/) (2018)
- [A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00787/) (2018)
- [Explaining the Explainer: A First Theoretical Analysis of LIME](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03447/) (2020)
- [Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09548/) (2018)
- [Defining Locality for Surrogates in Post-hoc Interpretablity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07498/) (2018)
- [Global Aggregations of Local Explanations for Black Box models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.03039/) (2019)
- [Making ML models fairer through explanations: the case of LimeOut](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00603/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The paper is devoted to the study of the model fairness and process fairness of the Russian demographic dataset by making predictions of divorce of the 1st marriage, religiosity, 1st employment and completion of education. Our goal was to make classifiers more equitable by reducing their reliance on sensitive features while increasing or at least maintaining their accuracy. We took inspiration from "dropout" techniques in neural-based approaches and suggested a model that uses "feature drop-out" to address process fairness. To evaluate a classifier's fairness and decide the sensitive features to eliminate, we used "LIME Explanations". This results in a pool of classifiers due to feature dropout whose ensemble has been shown to be less reliant on sensitive features and to have improved or no effect on accuracy. Our empirical study was performed on four families of classifiers (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Bagging, and Adaboost) and carried out on real-life dataset (Russian demographic data derived from Generations and Gender Survey), and it showed that all of the models became less dependent on sensitive features (such as gender, breakup of the 1st partnership, 1st partnership, etc.) and showed improvements or no impact on accuracy