# Error Scaling Laws for Kernel Classification under Source and Capacity Conditions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.12655 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12655/

## Key facts

- Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empirically](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00409/) (2017)
- [Benign Overfitting in Linear Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.11300/) (2019)
- [Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14701/) (2020)
- [Explaining Neural Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06701/) (2021)
- [High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.03667/) (2017)
- [A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12673/) (2019)
- [Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.02561/) (2020)
- [Spectral Bias and Task-Model Alignment Explain Generalization in Kernel Regression and Infinitely Wide Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13198/) (2020)
- [High-Dimensional Asymptotics of Prediction: Ridge Regression and Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.03003/) (2015)
- [Classification vs regression in overparameterized regimes: Does the loss function matter?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.08054/) (2020)
- [Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy Regime](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.15004/) (2021)
- [Learning Curve Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04074/) (2021)
- [Statistical Mechanics of Deep Linear Neural Networks: The Back-Propagating Kernel Renormalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.04030/) (2020)
- [Statistical Optimality of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Hard Learning Problems through Multiple Passes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.10074/) (2018)
- [Optimal Rates for Spectral Algorithms with Least-Squares Regression over Hilbert Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.06720/) (2018)
- [Separation of Scales and a Thermodynamic Description of Feature Learning in Some CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.15383/) (2021)
- [Generalization error in high-dimensional perceptrons: Approaching Bayes error with convex optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06560/) (2020)
- [Last iterate convergence of SGD for Least-Squares in the Interpolation regime](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.03183/) (2021)
- [Tight Nonparametric Convergence Rates for Stochastic Gradient Descent under the Noiseless Linear Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08212/) (2020)
- [Kernel regression in high dimensions: Refined analysis beyond double descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02681/) (2020)
- [On the proliferation of support vectors in high dimensions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10670/) (2020)
- [Beyond Least-Squares: Fast Rates for Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization through Self-Concordance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.03046/) (2019)
- [Learning curves for Gaussian process regression with power-law priors and targets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.12231/) (2021)
- [Kernel Truncated Randomized Ridge Regression: Optimal Rates and Low Noise Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10680/) (2019)
- [The Nystr"om method for convex loss functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10016/) (2020)
- [Support vector machines and linear regression coincide with very high-dimensional features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14084/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07043/) (2024)
- [Model Collapse Demystified: The Case of Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07712/) (2024)
- [Strong Model Collapse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04840/) (2024)
- [How Feature Learning Can Improve Neural Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17858/) (2024)
- [Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00592/) (2024)
- [Bayes-optimal Learning of Deep Random Networks of Extensive-width](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00375/) (2023)
- [There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21691/) (2026)
- [High-dimensional Asymptotics of Denoising Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11041/) (2023)
- [Deep Linear Network Training Dynamics from Random Initialization: Data, Width, Depth, and Hyperparameter Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02531/) (2025)
- [A Random Matrix Theory Perspective on the Spectrum of Learned Features and Asymptotic Generalization Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18938/) (2024)
- [High-dimensional learning of narrow neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13904/) (2024)
- [Kernel ridge regression under power-law data: spectrum and generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04780/) (2025)
- [Optimal scaling laws in learning hierarchical multi-index models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05846/) (2026)
- [AlphaZero Neural Scaling and Zipf's Law: a Tale of Board Games and Power Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11979/) (2024)
- [Quantifying Overfitting along the Regularization Path for Two-Part-Code MDL in Supervised Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02110/) (2025)
- [On the Existence of Consistent Adversarial Attacks in High-Dimensional Linear Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12454/) (2025)
- [No Free Lunch From Random Feature Ensembles: Scaling Laws and Near-Optimality Conditions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05418/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of kernel classification. While worst-case bounds on the decay rate of the prediction error with the number of samples are known for some classifiers, they often fail to accurately describe the learning curves of real data sets. In this work, we consider the important class of data sets satisfying the standard source and capacity conditions, comprising a number of real data sets as we show numerically. Under the Gaussian design, we derive the decay rates for the misclassification (prediction) error as a function of the source and capacity coefficients. We do so for two standard kernel classification settings, namely margin-maximizing Support Vector Machines (SVM) and ridge classification, and contrast the two methods. We find that our rates tightly describe the learning curves for this class of data sets, and are also observed on real data. Our results can also be seen as an explicit prediction of the exponents of a scaling law for kernel classification that is accurate on some real datasets.
