# A Multi-rater Comparative Study of Automatic Target Localization Methods for Epilepsy Deep Brain Stimulation Procedures

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11002 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11002/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Numerical Coordinate Regression with Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07372/) (2018)
- [Uncertainty Estimation in Medical Image Localization: Towards Robust Anterior Thalamus Targeting for Deep Brain Stimulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02067/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Epilepsy is the fourth most common neurological disorder and affects people of all ages worldwide. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has emerged as an alternative treatment option when anti-epileptic drugs or resective surgery cannot lead to satisfactory outcomes. To facilitate the planning of the procedure and for its standardization, it is desirable to develop an algorithm to automatically localize the DBS stimulation target, i.e., Anterior Nucleus of Thalamus (ANT), which is a challenging target to plan. In this work, we perform an extensive comparative study by benchmarking various localization methods for ANT-DBS. Specifically, the methods involved in this study include traditional registration method and deep-learning-based methods including heatmap matching and differentiable spatial to numerical transform (DSNT). Our experimental results show that the deep-learning (DL)-based localization methods that are trained with pseudo labels can achieve a performance that is comparable to the inter-rater and intra-rater variability and that they are orders of magnitude faster than traditional methods.