# Virtual Adversarial Training for Semi-supervised Breast Mass Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10675 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.10675/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02249/) (2019)
- [A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05747/) (2017)
- [Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12848/) (2019)
- [Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03976/) (2017)
- [Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.02968/) (2017)
- [Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01780/) (2017)
- [Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08987/) (2017)
- [Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13381/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study aims to develop a novel computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for mammographic breast mass classification using semi-supervised learning. Although supervised deep learning has achieved huge success across various medical image analysis tasks, its success relies on large amounts of high-quality annotations, which can be challenging to acquire in practice. To overcome this limitation, we propose employing a semi-supervised method, i.e., virtual adversarial training (VAT), to leverage and learn useful information underlying in unlabeled data for better classification of breast masses. Accordingly, our VAT-based models have two types of losses, namely supervised and virtual adversarial losses. The former loss acts as in supervised classification, while the latter loss aims at enhancing model robustness against virtual adversarial perturbation, thus improving model generalizability. To evaluate the performance of our VAT-based CAD scheme, we retrospectively assembled a total of 1024 breast mass images, with equal number of benign and malignant masses. A large CNN and a small CNN were used in this investigation, and both were trained with and without the adversarial loss. When the labeled ratios were 40% and 80%, VAT-based CNNs delivered the highest classification accuracy of 0.740 and 0.760, respectively. The experimental results suggest that the VAT-based CAD scheme can effectively utilize meaningful knowledge from unlabeled data to better classify mammographic breast mass images.
