# The Implicit Regularization of Momentum Gradient Descent with Early Stopping

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05405 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05405/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.03530/) (2016)
- [The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10345/) (2017)
- [Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08246/) (2018)
- [Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09839/) (2020)
- [A Continuous-Time View of Early Stopping for Least Squares](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.10082/) (2018)
- [The Implicit Regularization of Stochastic Gradient Flow for Least Squares](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07802/) (2020)
- [A Continuized View on Nesterov Acceleration for Stochastic Gradient Descent and Randomized Gossip](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07644/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The study on the implicit regularization induced by gradient-based optimization is a longstanding pursuit. In the present paper, we characterize the implicit regularization of momentum gradient descent (MGD) with early stopping by comparing with the explicit ℓ2-regularization (ridge). In details, we study MGD in the continuous-time view, so-called momentum gradient flow (MGF), and show that its tendency is closer to ridge than the gradient descent (GD) [Ali et al., 2019] for least squares regression. Moreover, we prove that, under the calibration t=√2/λ, where t is the time parameter in MGF and λ is the tuning parameter in ridge regression, the risk of MGF is no more than 1.54 times that of ridge. In particular, the relative Bayes risk of MGF to ridge is between 1 and 1.035 under the optimal tuning. The numerical experiments support our theoretical results strongly.
