# On the Efficacy of Co-Attention Transformer Layers in Visual Question Answering

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03965 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03965/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02265/) (2019)
- [LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07490/) (2019)
- [VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03557/) (2019)
- [Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06165/) (2020)
- [VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08530/) (2019)
- [VideoBERT: A Joint Model for Video and Language Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01766/) (2019)
- [Unified Vision-Language Pre-Training for Image Captioning and VQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11059/) (2019)
- [Unicoder-VL: A Universal Encoder for Vision and Language by Cross-modal Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06066/) (2019)
- [Multi-modal Transformer for Video Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.10639/) (2020)
- [Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15679/) (2021)
- [Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.00061/) (2016)
- [12-in-1: Multi-Task Vision and Language Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02315/) (2019)
- [Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02274/) (2015)
- [Analyzing the Behavior of Visual Question Answering Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.07356/) (2016)
- [Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03556/) (2016)
- [An Analysis of Visual Question Answering Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.09684/) (2017)
- [Towards Transparent AI Systems: Interpreting Visual Question Answering Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.08974/) (2016)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [BAN-Cap: A Multi-Purpose English-Bangla Image Descriptions Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14462/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, multi-modal transformers have shown significant progress in Vision-Language tasks, such as Visual Question Answering (VQA), outperforming previous architectures by a considerable margin. This improvement in VQA is often attributed to the rich interactions between vision and language streams. In this work, we investigate the efficacy of co-attention transformer layers in helping the network focus on relevant regions while answering the question. We generate visual attention maps using the question-conditioned image attention scores in these co-attention layers. We evaluate the effect of the following critical components on visual attention of a state-of-the-art VQA model: (i) number of object region proposals, (ii) question part of speech (POS) tags, (iii) question semantics, (iv) number of co-attention layers, and (v) answer accuracy. We compare the neural network attention maps against human attention maps both qualitatively and quantitatively. Our findings indicate that co-attention transformer modules are crucial in attending to relevant regions of the image given a question. Importantly, we observe that the semantic meaning of the question is not what drives visual attention, but specific keywords in the question do. Our work sheds light on the function and interpretation of co-attention transformer layers, highlights gaps in current networks, and can guide the development of future VQA models and networks that simultaneously process visual and language streams.