# DANNTe: a case study of a turbo-machinery sensor virtualization under domain shift

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03850 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03850/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2022.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.07818/) (2015)
- [Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.05464/) (2017)
- [A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02849/) (2018)
- [Maximum Density Divergence for Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12615/) (2020)
- [f-Domain-Adversarial Learning: Theory and Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11344/) (2021)
- [Transfer Learning with Dynamic Adversarial Adaptation Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08184/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose an adversarial learning method to tackle a Domain Adaptation (DA) time series regression task (DANNTe). The regression aims at building a virtual copy of a sensor installed on a gas turbine, to be used in place of the physical sensor which can be missing in certain situations. Our DA approach is to search for a domain-invariant representation of the features. The learner has access to both a labelled source dataset and an unlabeled target dataset (unsupervised DA) and is trained on both, exploiting the minmax game between a task regressor and a domain classifier Neural Networks. Both models share the same feature representation, learnt by a feature extractor. This work is based on the results published by Ganin et al. arXiv:1505.07818; indeed, we present an extension suitable to time series applications. We report a significant improvement in regression performance, compared to the baseline model trained on the source domain only.
