# Isotuning With Applications To Scale-Free Online Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.14586 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14586/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Introduction to Online Convex Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05207/) (2019)
- [A Second-order Bound with Excess Losses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1402.2044/) (2014)
- [Scale-Free Online Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1601.01974/) (2016)
- [Follow the Leader If You Can, Hedge If You Must](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.0534/) (2013)
- [Lipschitz and Comparator-Norm Adaptivity in Online Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12242/) (2020)
- [Impossible Tuning Made Possible: A New Expert Algorithm and Its Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01046/) (2021)
- [Nonstochastic Multiarmed Bandits with Unrestricted Delays](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00670/) (2019)
- [An Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial Bandits with Arbitrary Delays](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06054/) (2019)
- [Lipschitz Adaptivity with Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10797/) (2019)
- [Optimal learning with Bernstein Online Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1404.1356/) (2014)
- [Online Learning with Optimism and Delay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06885/) (2021)
- [Adapting to Delays and Data in Adversarial Multi-Armed Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06022/) (2020)
- [Exploration by Optimisation in Partial Monitoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05772/) (2019)
- [Online mirror descent and dual averaging: keeping pace in the dynamic case](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.02585/) (2020)
- [Temporal Variability in Implicit Online Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07503/) (2020)
- [Efficient tracking of a growing number of experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.09811/) (2017)
- [Soft-Bayes: Prod for Mixtures of Experts with Log-Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.02230/) (2019)
- [Scale-Free Adversarial Multi-Armed Bandit with Arbitrary Feedback Delays](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13400/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Banker Online Mirror Descent: A Universal Approach for Delayed Online Bandit Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10500/) (2023)
- [Levin Tree Search with Context Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16945/) (2023)
- [U-Clip: On-Average Unbiased Stochastic Gradient Clipping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02971/) (2023)
- [When Lower-Order Terms Dominate: Adaptive Expert Algorithms for Heavy-Tailed Losses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01722/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We extend and combine several tools of the literature to design fast, adaptive, anytime and scale-free online learning algorithms. Scale-free regret bounds must scale linearly with the maximum loss, both toward large losses and toward very small losses. Adaptive regret bounds demonstrate that an algorithm can take advantage of easy data and potentially have constant regret. We seek to develop fast algorithms that depend on as few parameters as possible, in particular they should be anytime and thus not depend on the time horizon. Our first and main tool, isotuning, is a generalization of the idea of designing adaptive learning rates that balance the trade-off of the regret. We provide a simple and versatile theorem that can be applied to a wide range of settings, and competes with the best balancing in hindsight within a factor 2. The second tool is an online correction, which allows us to obtain centered bounds for many algorithms, to prevent the regret bounds from being vacuous when the domain is overly large or only partially constrained. The last tool, null updates, prevents the algorithm from performing overly large updates, which could result in unbounded regret, or even invalid updates. We develop a general theory to combine all these tools and apply it to several standard algorithms. In particular, we (almost entirely) restore the adaptivity to small losses of FTRL for unbounded domains, design and prove scale-free adaptive guarantees for a variant of Mirror Descent (at least when the Bregman divergence is convex in its second argument), extend Adapt-ML-Prod to scale-free guarantees, and provide several additional contributions about Prod, AdaHedge, BOA and Soft-Bayes.
