# HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.03184 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03184/

## Key facts

- Cited by 105 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 55 of its 88 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 55)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.04150/) (2015)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.2901/) (2013)
- [Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04730/) (2017)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08608/) (2017)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04612/) (2020)
- [RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07421/) (2018)
- [This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10574/) (2018)
- [Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05796/) (2017)
- [Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03296/) (2017)
- [Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01279/) (2019)
- [Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00069/) (2018)
- [A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10758/) (2018)
- [Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11251/) (2021)
- [Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backprop](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.00507/) (2016)
- [Counterfactual Visual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.07451/) (2019)
- [Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02114/) (2020)
- [Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.00760/) (2019)
- [Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Masks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.08485/) (2019)
- [Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07810/) (2018)
- [Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05041/) (2020)
- [Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.02046/) (2020)
- [Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01831/) (2020)
- [Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.09720/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 105)

- [CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10154/) (2022)
- [A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07304/) (2023)
- [Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11584/) (2022)
- [Understanding the Role of Human Intuition on Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making with Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07255/) (2023)
- [Archetypal SAE: Adaptive and Stable Dictionary Learning for Concept Extraction in Large Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12892/) (2025)
- ["I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00623/) (2024)
- [ProtoPFormer: Concentrating on Prototypical Parts in Vision Transformers for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.10431/) (2022)
- ["Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03735/) (2022)
- [Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03714/) (2025)
- [In Search of Verifiability: Explanations Rarely Enable Complementary Performance in AI-Advised Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07722/) (2023)
- [FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06248/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Counterfactual Visual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09962/) (2023)
- [Overlooked factors in concept-based explanations: Dataset choice, concept learnability, and human capability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.09615/) (2022)
- [Visual correspondence-based explanations improve AI robustness and human-AI team accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.00780/) (2022)
- [Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and Inconsistencies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08554/) (2025)
- [Don't Lie to Me! Robust and Efficient Explainability with Verified Perturbation Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07728/) (2022)
- [Evaluation and Improvement of Interpretability for Self-Explainable Part-Prototype Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.05946/) (2022)
- [This Looks Like Those: Illuminating Prototypical Concepts Using Multiple Visualizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18589/) (2023)
- [FIND: A Function Description Benchmark for Evaluating Interpretability Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03886/) (2023)
- [Unlocking Feature Visualization for Deeper Networks with MAgnitude Constrained Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06805/) (2023)
- [ICICLE: Interpretable Class Incremental Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07811/) (2023)
- [LLM-Generated Black-box Explanations Can Be Adversarially Helpful](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06800/) (2024)
- [Machine Explanations and Human Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04092/) (2022)
- [Scale Alone Does not Improve Mechanistic Interpretability in Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05471/) (2023)
- [Pixel-Grounded Prototypical Part Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14531/) (2023)
- [Interpretable LLM-based Table Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12386/) (2024)
- [Concept-based Explanations for Out-Of-Distribution Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02586/) (2022)
- [CLEVR-X: A Visual Reasoning Dataset for Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02380/) (2022)
- [The Co-12 Recipe for Evaluating Interpretable Part-Prototype Image Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14517/) (2023)
- [LucidPPN: Unambiguous Prototypical Parts Network for User-centric Interpretable Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14331/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As AI technology is increasingly applied to high-impact, high-risk domains, there have been a number of new methods aimed at making AI models more human interpretable. Despite the recent growth of interpretability work, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of proposed techniques. In this work, we introduce HIVE (Human Interpretability of Visual Explanations), a novel human evaluation framework that assesses the utility of explanations to human users in AI-assisted decision making scenarios, and enables falsifiable hypothesis testing, cross-method comparison, and human-centered evaluation of visual interpretability methods. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work of its kind. Using HIVE, we conduct IRB-approved human studies with nearly 1000 participants and evaluate four methods that represent the diversity of computer vision interpretability works: GradCAM, BagNet, ProtoPNet, and ProtoTree. Our results suggest that explanations engender human trust, even for incorrect predictions, yet are not distinct enough for users to distinguish between correct and incorrect predictions. We open-source HIVE to enable future studies and encourage more human-centered approaches to interpretability research.