# Achieving a Data-driven Risk Assessment Methodology for Ethical AI

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01282 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01282/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2021.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06235/) (2024)
- [Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02197/) (2026)
- [AI Governance in Higher Education: Case Studies of Guidance at Big Ten Universities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02017/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The AI landscape demands a broad set of legal, ethical, and societal considerations to be accounted for in order to develop ethical AI (eAI) solutions which sustain human values and rights. Currently, a variety of guidelines and a handful of niche tools exist to account for and tackle individual challenges. However, it is also well established that many organizations face practical challenges in navigating these considerations from a risk management perspective. Therefore, new methodologies are needed to provide a well-vetted and real-world applicable structure and path through the checks and balances needed for ethically assessing and guiding the development of AI. In this paper we show that a multidisciplinary research approach, spanning cross-sectional viewpoints, is the foundation of a pragmatic definition of ethical and societal risks faced by organizations using AI. Equally important is the findings of cross-structural governance for implementing eAI successfully. Based on evidence acquired from our multidisciplinary research investigation, we propose a novel data-driven risk assessment methodology, entitled DRESS-eAI. In addition, through the evaluation of our methodological implementation, we demonstrate its state-of-the-art relevance as a tool for sustaining human values in the data-driven AI era.
