# Machine unlearning via GAN

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11869 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.11869/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2021.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00028/) (2017)
- [Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03817/) (2019)
- [The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08232/) (2018)
- [Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04933/) (2019)
- [Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03030/) (2019)
- [ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01246/) (2018)
- [Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05012/) (2019)
- [Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.04862/) (2017)
- [Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tail](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05271/) (2019)
- [Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10077/) (2020)
- [Machine Unlearning for Random Forests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05567/) (2020)
- [Federated Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13891/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [A Survey of Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.02299/) (2022)
- [Exploring the Landscape of Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06360/) (2023)
- [Machine Unlearning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03558/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Machine Unlearning: Techniques and New Emerged Privacy Risks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06186/) (2024)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09881/) (2023)
- [Forgetting Through Transforming: Enabling Federated Unlearning via Class-Aware Representation Transformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06848/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models, especially deep models, may unintentionally remember information about their training data. Malicious attackers can thus pilfer some property about training data by attacking the model via membership inference attack or model inversion attack. Some regulations, such as the EU's GDPR, have enacted "The Right to Be Forgotten" to protect users' data privacy, enhancing individuals' sovereignty over their data. Therefore, removing training data information from a trained model has become a critical issue. In this paper, we present a GAN-based algorithm to delete data in deep models, which significantly improves deleting speed compared to retraining from scratch, especially in complicated scenarios. We have experimented on five commonly used datasets, and the experimental results show the efficiency of our method.
