# Reducing the Long Tail Losses in Scientific Emulations with Active Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08498 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08498/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.02910/) (2017)
- [Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03671/) (2019)
- [BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08158/) (2019)
- [Kernel Operations on the GPU, with Autodiff, without Memory Overflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11127/) (2020)
- [By-passing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02815/) (2016)
- [Building high accuracy emulators for scientific simulations with deep neural architecture search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08055/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep-learning-based models are increasingly used to emulate scientific simulations to accelerate scientific research. However, accurate, supervised deep learning models require huge amount of labelled data, and that often becomes the bottleneck in employing neural networks. In this work, we leveraged an active learning approach called core-set selection to actively select data, per a pre-defined budget, to be labelled for training. To further improve the model performance and reduce the training costs, we also warm started the training using a shrink-and-perturb trick. We tested on two case studies in different fields, namely galaxy halo occupation distribution modelling in astrophysics and x-ray emission spectroscopy in plasma physics, and the results are promising: we achieved competitive overall performance compared to using a random sampling baseline, and more importantly, successfully reduced the larger absolute losses, i.e. the long tail in the loss distribution, at virtually no overhead costs.