# Complementary Ensemble Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08449 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08449/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.04150/) (2015)
- [Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02357/) (2016)
- [Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07261/) (2016)
- [Feature Learning from Incomplete EEG with Denoising Autoencoder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.0818/) (2014)
- [AutoGAN-based Dimension Reduction for Privacy Preservation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10799/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Not All Models Are Equal: Predicting Model Transferability in a Self-challenging Fisher Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.03036/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

To achieve high performance of a machine learning (ML) task, a deep learning-based model must implicitly capture the entire distribution from data. Thus, it requires a huge amount of training samples, and data are expected to fully present the real distribution, especially for high dimensional data, e.g., images, videos. In practice, however, data are usually collected with a diversity of styles, and several of them have insufficient number of representatives. This might lead to uncertainty in models' prediction, and significantly reduce ML task performance. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive study on this problem by looking at model uncertainty. From this, we derive a simple but efficient technique to improve performance of state-of-the-art deep learning models. Specifically, we train auxiliary models which are able to complement state-of-the-art model uncertainty. As a result, by assembling these models, we can significantly improve the ML task performance for types of data mentioned earlier. While slightly improving ML classification accuracy on benchmark datasets (e.g., 0.2% on MNIST), our proposed method significantly improves on limited data (i.e., 1.3% on Eardrum and 3.5% on ChestXray).