# Fast First-Order Methods for Monotone Strongly DR-Submodular Maximization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07990 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07990/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Convex optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01946/) (2021)
- [Online Continuous Submodular Maximization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.06052/) (2018)
- [Gradient Methods for Submodular Maximization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.03949/) (2017)
- [Guaranteed Non-convex Optimization: Submodular Maximization over Continuous Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05615/) (2016)
- [Optimal approximation for submodular and supermodular optimization with bounded curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.4728/) (2013)
- [Guess Free Maximization of Submodular and Linear Sums](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03813/) (2018)
- [Continuous Submodular Function Maximization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13474/) (2020)
- [Bounding Inefficiency of Equilibria in Continuous Actions Games using Submodularity and Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00950/) (2019)
- [Improved Regret Bounds for Online Submodular Maximization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07836/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [A Unified Approach for Maximizing Continuous DR-submodular Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16671/) (2023)
- [From Linear to Linearizable Optimization: A Novel Framework with Applications to Stationary and Non-stationary DR-submodular Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00065/) (2024)
- [Decentralized Projection-free Online Upper-Linearizable Optimization with Applications to DR-Submodular Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18183/) (2025)
- [Upper-Linearizability of Online Non-Monotone DR-Submodular Maximization over Down-Closed Convex Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20578/) (2026)
- [Online SuBmodular + SuPermodular (BP) Maximization with Bandit Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.03091/) (2022)
- [γ-weakly θ-up-concavity: A Unified Framework for Non-Convex Optimization Beyond DR-Submodular and OSS Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13506/) (2026)
- [Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07952/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Continuous DR-submodular functions are a class of functions that satisfy the Diminishing Returns (DR) property, which implies that they are concave along non-negative directions. Existing works have studied monotone continuous DR-submodular maximization subject to a convex constraint and have proposed efficient algorithms with approximation guarantees. However, in many applications, e.g., computing the stability number of a graph and mean-field inference for probabilistic log-submodular models, the DR-submodular function has the additional property of being strongly concave along non-negative directions that could be utilized for obtaining faster convergence rates. In this paper, we first introduce and characterize the class of strongly DR-submodular functions and show how such a property implies strong concavity along non-negative directions. Then, we study L-smooth monotone strongly DR-submodular functions that have bounded curvature, and we show how to exploit such additional structure to obtain algorithms with improved approximation guarantees and faster convergence rates for the maximization problem. In particular, we propose the SDRFW algorithm that matches the provably optimal 1-fracce approximation ratio after only lceilfracLμrceil iterations, where c∈[0,1] and μ≥ 0 are the curvature and the strong DR-submodularity parameter. Furthermore, we study the Projected Gradient Ascent (PGA) method for this problem and provide a refined analysis of the algorithm with an improved frac11+c approximation ratio and a linear convergence rate. Given that both algorithms require knowledge of the smoothness parameter L, we provide a novel characterization of L for DR-submodular functions showing that in many cases, computing L could be formulated as a convex problem, i.e., a geometric program, that could be solved efficiently.
