# Inclusive Speaker Verification with Adaptive thresholding

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05501 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05501/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.01507/) (2017)
- [Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05431/) (2016)
- [CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.09414/) (2018)
- [VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05622/) (2018)
- [VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08612/) (2017)
- [VGGSound: A Large-scale Audio-Visual Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14368/) (2020)
- [Res2Net: A New Multi-scale Backbone Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01169/) (2019)
- [MUSAN: A Music, Speech, and Noise Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.08484/) (2015)
- [In defence of metric learning for speaker recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.11982/) (2020)
- [Attentive Statistics Pooling for Deep Speaker Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10963/) (2018)
- [BUT System Description to VoxCeleb Speaker Recognition Challenge 2019](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12592/) (2019)
- [Utterance-level Aggregation For Speaker Recognition In The Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10107/) (2019)
- [The PyTorch-Kaldi Speech Recognition Toolkit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07453/) (2018)
- [VoxSRC 2020: The Second VoxCeleb Speaker Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06867/) (2020)
- [ResNeXt and Res2Net Structures for Speaker Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02480/) (2020)
- [Cross attentive pooling for speaker verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.05983/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09891/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While using a speaker verification (SV) based system in a commercial application, it is important that customers have an inclusive experience irrespective of their gender, age, or ethnicity. In this paper, we analyze the impact of gender and age on SV and find that for a desired common False Acceptance Rate (FAR) across different gender and age groups, the False Rejection Rate (FRR) is different for different gender and age groups. To optimize FRR for all users for a desired FAR, we propose a context (e.g. gender, age) adaptive thresholding framework for SV. The context can be available as prior information for many practical applications. We also propose a concatenated gender/age detection model to algorithmically derive the context in absence of such prior information. We experimentally show that our context-adaptive thresholding method is effective in building a more efficient inclusive SV system. Specifically, we show that we can reduce FRR for specific gender for a desired FAR on the voxceleb1 test set by using gender-specific thresholds. Similar analysis on OGI kids' speech corpus shows that by using an age-specific threshold, we can significantly reduce FRR for certain age groups for desired FAR.
