# Confounds and Overestimations in Fake Review Detection: Experimentally Controlling for Product-Ownership and Data-Origin

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.15130 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.15130/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 65 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Automatic Detection of Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07104/) (2017)
- [A framework for fake review detection in online consumer electronics retailers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12452/) (2019)
- [Women worry about family, men about the economy: Gender differences in emotional responses to COVID-19](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08202/) (2020)
- [Improving Opinion Spam Detection by Cumulative Relative Frequency Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13905/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A persistent accuracy ceiling in automated verbal deception detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12118/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The popularity of online shopping is steadily increasing. At the same time, fake product reviewsare published widely and have the potential to affect consumer purchasing behavior. In response,previous work has developed automated methods for the detection of deceptive product reviews.However, studies vary considerably in terms of classification performance, and many use data thatcontain potential confounds, which makes it difficult to determine their validity. Two possibleconfounds are data-origin (i.e., the dataset is composed of more than one source) and productownership (i.e., reviews written by individuals who own or do not own the reviewed product). Inthe present study, we investigate the effect of both confounds for fake review detection. Using anexperimental design, we manipulate data-origin, product ownership, review polarity, and veracity.Supervised learning analysis suggests that review veracity (60.26 - 69.87%) is somewhat detectablebut reviews additionally confounded with product-ownership (66.19 - 74.17%), or with data-origin(84.44 - 86.94%) are easier to classify. Review veracity is most easily classified if confounded withproduct-ownership and data-origin combined (87.78 - 88.12%), suggesting overestimations of thetrue performance in other work. These findings are moderated by review polarity.