# Subspace Detours Meet Gromov-Wasserstein

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.10932 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.10932/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.0895/) (2013)
- [Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1507.00504/) (2015)
- [Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.09114/) (2018)
- [Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07645/) (2019)
- [Subspace Robust Wasserstein Distances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08949/) (2019)
- [Sliced Gromov-Wasserstein](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10124/) (2019)
- [Minibatch optimal transport distances; analysis and applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.01792/) (2021)
- [Convergence Rate of Frank-Wolfe for Non-Convex Objectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00345/) (2016)
- [Sum-of-Squares Polynomial Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02325/) (2019)
- [Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and Costs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01128/) (2021)
- [Generalized Spectral Clustering via Gromov-Wasserstein Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04163/) (2020)
- [On Projection Robust Optimal Transport: Sample Complexity and Model Misspecification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12301/) (2020)
- [Towards Optimal Transport with Global Invariances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.09277/) (2018)
- [Subspace Detours: Building Transport Plans that are Optimal on Subspace Projections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10099/) (2019)
- [Quantized Gromov-Wasserstein](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02013/) (2021)
- [A contribution to Optimal Transport on incomparable spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.04447/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Meta Optimal Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05262/) (2022)
- [Scalable Optimal Transport Methods in Machine Learning: A Contemporary Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05080/) (2023)
- [Learning representations that are closed-form Monge mapping optimal with application to domain adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07500/) (2023)
- [Interpolating between Clustering and Dimensionality Reduction with Gromov-Wasserstein](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03398/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the context of optimal transport methods, the subspace detour approach was recently presented by Muzellec and Cuturi (2019). It consists in building a nearly optimal transport plan in the measures space from an optimal transport plan in a wisely chosen subspace, onto which the original measures are projected. The contribution of this paper is to extend this category of methods to the Gromov-Wasserstein problem, which is a particular type of transport distance involving the inner geometry of the compared distributions. After deriving the associated formalism and properties, we also discuss a specific cost for which we can show connections with the Knothe-Rosenblatt rearrangement. We finally give an experimental illustration on a shape matching problem.
