# Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01889 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01889/

## Key facts

- Cited by 491 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 123 of its 250 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 123)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04958/) (2019)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.00596/) (2019)
- [CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04899/) (2019)
- [Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01144/) (2016)
- [Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10902/) (2019)
- [Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00028/) (2017)
- [Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06434/) (2015)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08734/) (2018)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09406/) (2017)
- [Transformers in Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.01169/) (2021)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11063/) (2017)
- [Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1404.7828/) (2014)
- [Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.07792/) (2016)
- [Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11959/) (2021)
- [Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.00503/) (2019)
- [Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08218/) (2020)
- [DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04247/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 491)

- [TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01848/) (2022)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15361/) (2023)
- [Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06280/) (2022)
- [TabLLM: Few-shot Classification of Tabular Data with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10723/) (2022)
- [ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.09426/) (2022)
- [When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02997/) (2023)
- [Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.08815/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17944/) (2024)
- [LIFT: Language-Interfaced Fine-Tuning for Non-Language Machine Learning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06565/) (2022)
- [TransTab: Learning Transferable Tabular Transformers Across Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09328/) (2022)
- [OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11104/) (2022)
- [Why Tabular Foundation Models Should Be a Research Priority](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01147/) (2024)
- [CoDi: Co-evolving Contrastive Diffusion Models for Mixed-type Tabular Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12654/) (2023)
- [Large Scale Transfer Learning for Tabular Data via Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12031/) (2024)
- [Best of Both Worlds: Multimodal Contrastive Learning with Tabular and Imaging Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14080/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Distribution Shift in Tabular Data with TableShift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07577/) (2023)
- [Generating and Imputing Tabular Data via Diffusion and Flow-based Gradient-Boosted Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09968/) (2023)
- [Retrieval & Fine-Tuning for In-Context Tabular Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05207/) (2024)
- [Making Pre-trained Language Models Great on Tabular Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01841/) (2024)
- [Multimodal learning with graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03299/) (2022)
- [Transfer Learning with Deep Tabular Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.15306/) (2022)
- [OpenFE: Automated Feature Generation with Expert-level Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12507/) (2022)
- [TALENT: A Tabular Analytics and Learning Toolbox](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04057/) (2024)
- [TuneTables: Context Optimization for Scalable Prior-Data Fitted Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11137/) (2024)
- [T2G-Former: Organizing Tabular Features into Relation Graphs Promotes Heterogeneous Feature Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16887/) (2022)
- [A Closer Look at TabPFN v2: Understanding Its Strengths and Extending Its Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17361/) (2025)
- [Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06768/) (2022)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09591/) (2024)
- [SwitchTab: Switched Autoencoders Are Effective Tabular Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02013/) (2024)
- [Trompt: Towards a Better Deep Neural Network for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18446/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Heterogeneous tabular data are the most commonly used form of data and are essential for numerous critical and computationally demanding applications. On homogeneous data sets, deep neural networks have repeatedly shown excellent performance and have therefore been widely adopted. However, their adaptation to tabular data for inference or data generation tasks remains challenging. To facilitate further progress in the field, this work provides an overview of state-of-the-art deep learning methods for tabular data. We categorize these methods into three groups: data transformations, specialized architectures, and regularization models. For each of these groups, our work offers a comprehensive overview of the main approaches. Moreover, we discuss deep learning approaches for generating tabular data, and we also provide an overview over strategies for explaining deep models on tabular data. Thus, our first contribution is to address the main research streams and existing methodologies in the mentioned areas, while highlighting relevant challenges and open research questions. Our second contribution is to provide an empirical comparison of traditional machine learning methods with eleven deep learning approaches across five popular real-world tabular data sets of different sizes and with different learning objectives. Our results, which we have made publicly available as competitive benchmarks, indicate that algorithms based on gradient-boosted tree ensembles still mostly outperform deep learning models on supervised learning tasks, suggesting that the research progress on competitive deep learning models for tabular data is stagnating. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-depth overview of deep learning approaches for tabular data; as such, this work can serve as a valuable starting point to guide researchers and practitioners interested in deep learning with tabular data.