# What is understandable in Bayesian network explanations?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01322 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01322/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 1 of its 12 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Explaining predictions from Bayesian networks, for example to physicians, is non-trivial. Various explanation methods for Bayesian network inference have appeared in literature, focusing on different aspects of the underlying reasoning. While there has been a lot of technical research, there is very little known about how well humans actually understand these explanations. In this paper, we present ongoing research in which four different explanation approaches were compared through a survey by asking a group of human participants to interpret the explanations.