# Learning to Ask for Data-Efficient Event Argument Extraction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00479 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00479/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 3 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15723/) (2020)
- [Event Extraction by Answering (Almost) Natural Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13625/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Decoupling Knowledge from Memorization: Retrieval-augmented Prompt Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14704/) (2022)
- [Ontology-enhanced Prompt-tuning for Few-shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11332/) (2022)
- [DeepKE: A Deep Learning Based Knowledge Extraction Toolkit for Knowledge Base Population](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03335/) (2022)
- [Information Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios: Survey and Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08063/) (2022)
- [Contrastive Demonstration Tuning for Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.04392/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Event argument extraction (EAE) is an important task for information extraction to discover specific argument roles. In this study, we cast EAE as a question-based cloze task and empirically analyze fixed discrete token template performance. As generating human-annotated question templates is often time-consuming and labor-intensive, we further propose a novel approach called "Learning to Ask," which can learn optimized question templates for EAE without human annotations. Experiments using the ACE-2005 dataset demonstrate that our method based on optimized questions achieves state-of-the-art performance in both the few-shot and supervised settings.
