# Comparison of atlas-based and neural-network-based semantic segmentation for DENSE MRI images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.14116 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.14116/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [SegSort: Segmentation by Discriminative Sorting of Segments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06962/) (2019)
- [Importance-Aware Semantic Segmentation in Self-Driving with Discrete Wasserstein Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12440/) (2020)
- [Semantic Segmentation by Improved Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09917/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Two segmentation methods, one atlas-based and one neural-network-based, were compared to see how well they can each automatically segment the brain stem and cerebellum in Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DENSE-MRI) data. The segmentation is a pre-requisite for estimating the average displacements in these regions, which have recently been proposed as biomarkers in the diagnosis of Chiari Malformation type I (CMI). In numerical experiments, the segmentations of both methods were similar to manual segmentations provided by trained experts. It was found that, overall, the neural-network-based method alone produced more accurate segmentations than the atlas-based method did alone, but that a combination of the two methods -- in which the atlas-based method is used for the segmentation of the brain stem and the neural-network is used for the segmentation of the cerebellum -- may be the most successful.