# TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.13296 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13296/

## Key facts

- Cited by 120 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 46 of its 78 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 46)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.02860/) (2019)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [Cross-lingual Language Model Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07291/) (2019)
- [DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00536/) (2019)
- [Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02164/) (2019)
- [CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05858/) (2019)
- [Defending Against Neural Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12616/) (2019)
- [Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09203/) (2019)
- [GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04043/) (2019)
- ["Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00648/) (2017)
- [Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.01967/) (2017)
- [Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00650/) (2019)
- [code2seq: Generating Sequences from Structured Representations of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.01400/) (2018)
- [Facebook FAIR's WMT19 News Translation Task Submission](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06616/) (2019)
- [Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01314/) (2020)
- [Clinically Accurate Chest X-Ray Report Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02633/) (2019)
- [Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03351/) (2019)
- [Residual Energy-Based Models for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11714/) (2020)
- [Do Massively Pretrained Language Models Make Better Storytellers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.10705/) (2019)
- [Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03107/) (2017)
- [The Limitations of Stylometry for Detecting Machine-Generated Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09805/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 120)

- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14387/) (2023)
- [Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13788/) (2023)
- [RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07940/) (2024)
- [The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07205/) (2023)
- [M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14902/) (2023)
- [A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14724/) (2023)
- [MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14822/) (2023)
- [Machine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07321/) (2022)
- [Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00045/) (2024)
- [Do Language Models Plagiarize?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07618/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15654/) (2023)
- [DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20964/) (2024)
- [Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15515/) (2023)
- [M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11175/) (2024)
- [ArguGPT: evaluating, understanding and identifying argumentative essays generated by GPT models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07666/) (2023)
- [AI as Humanity's Salieri: Quantifying Linguistic Creativity of Language Models via Systematic Attribution of Machine Text against Web Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04265/) (2024)
- [Attribution and Obfuscation of Neural Text Authorship: A Data Mining Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10488/) (2022)
- [GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06202/) (2023)
- [Fighting Fire with Fire: Can ChatGPT Detect AI-generated Text?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01284/) (2023)
- [Machine-Made Media: Monitoring the Mobilization of Machine-Generated Articles on Misinformation and Mainstream News Websites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09820/) (2023)
- [DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23746/) (2024)
- [ConDA: Contrastive Domain Adaptation for AI-generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03992/) (2023)
- [Smaller Language Models are Better Black-box Machine-Generated Text Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09859/) (2023)
- [Are We in the AI-Generated Text World Already? Quantifying and Monitoring AIGT on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18148/) (2024)
- [CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10341/) (2022)
- [Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12150/) (2025)
- [On the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00025/) (2024)
- [SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14183/) (2024)
- [Findings of the The RuATD Shared Task 2022 on Artificial Text Detection in Russian](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01583/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent progress in generative language models has enabled machines to generate astonishingly realistic texts. While there are many legitimate applications of such models, there is also a rising need to distinguish machine-generated texts from human-written ones (e.g., fake news detection). However, to our best knowledge, there is currently no benchmark environment with datasets and tasks to systematically study the so-called "Turing Test" problem for neural text generation methods. In this work, we present the TuringBench benchmark environment, which is comprised of (1) a dataset with 200K human- or machine-generated samples across 20 labels {Human, GPT-1, GPT-2_small, GPT-2_medium, GPT-2_large, GPT-2_xl, GPT-2_PyTorch, GPT-3, GROVER_base, GROVER_large, GROVER_mega, CTRL, XLM, XLNET_base, XLNET_large, FAIR_wmt19, FAIR_wmt20, TRANSFORMER_XL, PPLM_distil, PPLM_gpt2}, (2) two benchmark tasks -- i.e., Turing Test (TT) and Authorship Attribution (AA), and (3) a website with leaderboards. Our preliminary experimental results using TuringBench show that FAIR_wmt20 and GPT-3 are the current winners, among all language models tested, in generating the most human-like indistinguishable texts with the lowest F1 score by five state-of-the-art TT detection models. The TuringBench is available at: https://turingbench.ist.psu.edu/