# AI in Osteoporosis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.10478 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10478/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [Going Deeper with Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.4842/) (2014)
- [Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.05027/) (2016)
- [Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.00712/) (2017)
- [Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.03409/) (2016)
- [Challenge IEEE-ISBI/TCB : Application of Covariance matrices and wavelet marginals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1410.2663/) (2014)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this chapter we explore and evaluate methods for trabecular bone characterization and osteoporosis diagnosis with increased interest in sparse approximations. We first describe texture representation and classification techniques, patch-based methods such as Bag of Keypoints, and more recent deep neural networks. Then we introduce the concept of sparse representations for pattern recognition and we detail integrative sparse analysis methods and classifier decision fusion methods. We report cross-validation results on osteoporosis datasets of bone radiographs and compare the results produced by the different categories of methods. We conclude that advances in the AI and machine learning fields have enabled the development of methods that can be used as diagnostic tools in clinical settings.