# Actionable Approaches to Promote Ethical AI in Libraries

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09672 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09672/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.00973/) (2020)
- [The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03425/) (2019)
- [Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.11668/) (2019)
- [AI Certification: Advancing Ethical Practice by Reducing Information Asymmetries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.10356/) (2021)
- [Governance by Glass-Box: Implementing Transparent Moral Bounds for AI Behaviour](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.04994/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI) in many domains has revealed numerous ethical issues from data and design to deployment. In response, countless broad principles and guidelines for ethical AI have been published, and following those, specific approaches have been proposed for how to encourage ethical outcomes of AI. Meanwhile, library and information services too are seeing an increase in the use of AI-powered and machine learning-powered information systems, but no practical guidance currently exists for libraries to plan for, evaluate, or audit the ethics of intended or deployed AI. We therefore report on several promising approaches for promoting ethical AI that can be adapted from other contexts to AI-powered information services and in different stages of the software lifecycle.