# A framework for benchmarking uncertainty in deep regression

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09048 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09048/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01474/) (2016)
- [What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04977/) (2017)
- [Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02530/) (2019)
- [Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.05424/) (2015)
- [Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trick](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02557/) (2015)
- [Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00263/) (2018)
- [Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for free](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00109/) (2017)
- [Concrete Dropout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07832/) (2017)
- [Evaluating Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Robust Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01620/) (2019)
- [An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10052/) (2018)
- [Uncertainty Estimates and Multi-Hypotheses Networks for Optical Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07095/) (2018)
- [Uncertainty in Neural Networks: Approximately Bayesian Ensembling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05546/) (2018)
- [Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent Kernel](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05864/) (2020)
- [Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11659/) (2019)
- [Uncertainty Baselines: Benchmarks for Uncertainty & Robustness in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04015/) (2021)
- [Quality of Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Neural Network Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.09686/) (2019)
- [Autonomous Driving with Deep Learning: A Survey of State-of-Art Technologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06091/) (2020)
- [Deeply Uncertain: Comparing Methods of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10710/) (2020)
- [Deep Ensembles from a Bayesian Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13283/) (2021)
- [Beyond Marginal Uncertainty: How Accurately can Bayesian Regression Models Estimate Posterior Predictive Correlations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03178/) (2020)
- [Deep Neural Networks for Computational Optical Form Measurements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00319/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07766/) (2022)
- [MUBen: Benchmarking the Uncertainty of Molecular Representation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10060/) (2023)
- [Lightning UQ Box: A Comprehensive Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03390/) (2024)
- [Measurement Uncertainty: Relating the uncertainties of physical and virtual measurements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13666/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a framework for the assessment of uncertainty quantification in deep regression. The framework is based on regression problems where the regression function is a linear combination of nonlinear functions. Basically, any level of complexity can be realized through the choice of the nonlinear functions and the dimensionality of their domain. Results of an uncertainty quantification for deep regression are compared against those obtained by a statistical reference method. The reference method utilizes knowledge of the underlying nonlinear functions and is based on a Bayesian linear regression using a reference prior. Reliability of uncertainty quantification is assessed in terms of coverage probabilities, and accuracy through the size of calculated uncertainties. We illustrate the proposed framework by applying it to current approaches for uncertainty quantification in deep regression. The flexibility, together with the availability of a reference solution, makes the framework suitable for defining benchmark sets for uncertainty quantification.
