# reproducing "ner and pos when nothing is capitalized"

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08396 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.08396/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.01360/) (2016)
- [Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Tagging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.01991/) (2015)
- [End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.01354/) (2016)
- [ner and pos when nothing is capitalized](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11222/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Capitalization is an important feature in many NLP tasks such as Named Entity Recognition (NER) or Part of Speech Tagging (POS). We are trying to reproduce results of paper which shows how to mitigate a significant performance drop when casing is mismatched between training and testing data. In particular we show that lowercasing 50% of the dataset provides the best performance, matching the claims of the original paper. We also show that we got slightly lower performance in almost all experiments we have tried to reproduce, suggesting that there might be some hidden factors impacting our performance. Lastly, we make all of our work available in a public github repository.