# I-DLV-sr: A Stream Reasoning System based on I-DLV

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.02797 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.02797/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Multi-shot ASP solving with clingo](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09811/) (2017)
- [ASP-Core-2 Input Language Format](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04326/) (2019)
- [Expressive Stream Reasoning with Laser](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08876/) (2017)
- [Benchmarking Distributed Stream Data Processing Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08496/) (2018)
- [A Distributed Approach to LARS Stream Reasoning (System paper)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.12344/) (2019)
- [Incremental maintenance of overgrounded logic programs with tailored simplifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.04108/) (2020)
- [Answer Set Programming for Stream Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.1392/) (2013)
- [Stream Reasoning-Based Control of Caching Strategies in CCN Routers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.04005/) (2016)
- [Incremental Answer Set Programming with Overgrounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.09212/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [ASP-based Multi-shot Reasoning via DLV2 with Incremental Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17143/) (2024)
- [A Formal Comparison between Datalog-based Languages for Stream Reasoning (extended version)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12726/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a novel logic-based system for reasoning over data streams, which relies on a framework enabling a tight, fine-tuned interaction between Apache Flink and the I^2-DLV system. The architecture allows to take advantage from both the powerful distributed stream processing capabilities of Flink and the incremental reasoning capabilities of I^2-DLV based on overgrounding techniques. Besides the system architecture, we illustrate the supported input language and its modeling capabilities, and discuss the results of an experimental activity aimed at assessing the viability of the approach. This paper is under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).