# Is My Model Using The Right Evidence? Systematic Probes for Examining Evidence-Based Tabular Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00578 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00578/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 57 of its 70 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 57)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.05326/) (2015)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Attention is not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10186/) (2019)
- [Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01007/) (2019)
- [Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02324/) (2018)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [Attention is not not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04626/) (2019)
- [Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.07328/) (2017)
- [ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03429/) (2019)
- [Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.00305/) (2015)
- [Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12434/) (2019)
- [TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.02349/) (2020)
- [TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02164/) (2019)
- [Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07998/) (2018)
- [TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.08314/) (2020)
- [Is Attention Interpretable?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03731/) (2019)
- [Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01042/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06059/) (2018)
- [ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14373/) (2020)
- [HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07347/) (2020)
- [Probing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Arguments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07355/) (2019)
- [Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00692/) (2018)
- [Generating Natural Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11342/) (2017)
- [Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07898/) (2019)
- [FEVEROUS: Fact Extraction and VERification Over Unstructured and Structured information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05707/) (2021)
- [Open Question Answering over Tables and Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10439/) (2020)
- [Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00719/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Explainable Fact-checking through Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05369/) (2021)
- [FREB-TQA: A Fine-Grained Robustness Evaluation Benchmark for Table Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18585/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Temporal Understanding in LLMs for Semi-structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16030/) (2024)
- [Span Classification with Structured Information for Disfluency Detection in Spoken Utterances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16028/) (2022)
- [Realistic Data Augmentation Framework for Enhancing Tabular Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12795/) (2022)
- [Enhancing Tabular Reasoning with Pattern Exploiting Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12259/) (2022)
- [Leveraging Data Recasting to Enhance Tabular Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12641/) (2022)
- [Few-Shot Dialogue Summarization via Skeleton-Assisted Prompt Transfer in Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12077/) (2023)
- [InfoSync: Information Synchronization across Multilingual Semi-structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03313/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural models command state-of-the-art performance across NLP tasks, including ones involving "reasoning". Models claiming to reason about the evidence presented to them should attend to the correct parts of the input avoiding spurious patterns therein, be self-consistent in their predictions across inputs, and be immune to biases derived from their pre-training in a nuanced, context-sensitive fashion. em Do the prevalent *BERT-family of models do so? In this paper, we study this question using the problem of reasoning on tabular data. Tabular inputs are especially well-suited for the study -- they admit systematic probes targeting the properties listed above. Our experiments demonstrate that a RoBERTa-based model, representative of the current state-of-the-art, fails at reasoning on the following counts: it (a) ignores relevant parts of the evidence, (b) is over-sensitive to annotation artifacts, and (c) relies on the knowledge encoded in the pre-trained language model rather than the evidence presented in its tabular inputs. Finally, through inoculation experiments, we show that fine-tuning the model on perturbed data does not help it overcome the above challenges.