# Social Processes: Self-Supervised Meta-Learning over Conversational Groups for Forecasting Nonverbal Social Cues

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13576 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13576/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 99 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00593/) (2016)
- [Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.1078/) (2014)
- [Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.3215/) (2014)
- [FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.06852/) (2015)
- [Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05439/) (2020)
- [Social GAN: Socially Acceptable Trajectories with Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10892/) (2018)
- [Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06349/) (2015)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Video Representations using LSTMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.04681/) (2015)
- [TNT: Target-driveN Trajectory Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08294/) (2020)
- [Social-STGCNN: A Social Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Network for Human Trajectory Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.11927/) (2020)
- [A Neural Representation of Sketch Drawings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03477/) (2017)
- [Attentive Neural Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.05761/) (2019)
- [Human Motion Trajectory Prediction: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06113/) (2019)
- [Geometric Loss Functions for Camera Pose Regression with Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00390/) (2017)
- [SR-LSTM: State Refinement for LSTM towards Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02793/) (2019)
- [QuaterNet: A Quaternion-based Recurrent Model for Human Motion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.06485/) (2018)
- [Video (language) modeling: a baseline for generative models of natural videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6604/) (2014)
- [The Pose Knows: Video Forecasting by Generating Pose Futures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00053/) (2017)
- [Style Transfer for Co-Speech Gesture Animation: A Multi-Speaker Conditional-Mixture Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12553/) (2020)
- [Sequential Neural Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10264/) (2019)
- [Socially and Contextually Aware Human Motion and Pose Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06843/) (2020)
- [Towards Social Artificial Intelligence: Nonverbal Social Signal Prediction in A Triadic Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04158/) (2019)
- [Dense Optical Flow Prediction from a Static Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00295/) (2015)
- [Learning to Act by Predicting the Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01779/) (2016)
- [To React or not to React: End-to-End Visual Pose Forecasting for Personalized Avatar during Dyadic Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02181/) (2019)
- [Forecasting Human Dynamics from Static Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03432/) (2017)
- [Recurrent Attentive Neural Process for Sequential Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09323/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [ConfLab: A Data Collection Concept, Dataset, and Benchmark for Machine Analysis of Free-Standing Social Interactions in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05177/) (2022)
- [Comparison of Spatio-Temporal Models for Human Motion and Pose Forecasting in Face-to-Face Interaction Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03245/) (2022)
- [Multimodal Quantitative Measures for Multiparty Behaviour Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10916/) (2025)
- [REWIND Dataset: Privacy-preserving Speaking Status Segmentation from Multimodal Body Movement Signals in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01229/) (2024)
- [Why Did This Model Forecast This Future? Closed-Form Temporal Saliency Towards Causal Explanations of Probabilistic Forecasts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00679/) (2022)
- [Generative Interactions: Weaving Multiparty Human Motion with Bilevel Latent Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37708/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Free-standing social conversations constitute a yet underexplored setting for human behavior forecasting. While the task of predicting pedestrian trajectories has received much recent attention, an intrinsic difference between these settings is how groups form and disband. Evidence from social psychology suggests that group members in a conversation explicitly self-organize to sustain the interaction by adapting to one another's behaviors. Crucially, the same individual is unlikely to adapt similarly across different groups; contextual factors such as perceived relationships, attraction, rapport, etc., influence the entire spectrum of participants' behaviors. A question arises: how can we jointly forecast the mutually dependent futures of conversation partners by modeling the dynamics unique to every group? In this paper, we propose the Social Process (SP) models, taking a novel meta-learning and stochastic perspective of group dynamics. Training group-specific forecasting models hinders generalization to unseen groups and is challenging given limited conversation data. In contrast, our SP models treat interaction sequences from a single group as a meta-dataset: we condition forecasts for a sequence from a given group on other observed-future sequence pairs from the same group. In this way, an SP model learns to adapt its forecasts to the unique dynamics of the interacting partners, generalizing to unseen groups in a data-efficient manner. Additionally, we first rethink the task formulation itself, motivating task requirements from social science literature that prior formulations have overlooked. For our formulation of Social Cue Forecasting, we evaluate the empirical performance of our SP models against both non-meta-learning and meta-learning approaches with similar assumptions. The SP models yield improved performance on synthetic and real-world behavior datasets.
