# Neural Network Branch-and-Bound for Neural Network Verification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.12855 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.12855/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2021.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.07316/) (2016)
- [Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.01135/) (2017)
- [Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09940/) (2016)
- [Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytope](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00851/) (2017)
- [Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01665/) (2017)
- [Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00866/) (2018)
- [On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.12715/) (2018)
- [Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01629/) (2019)
- [Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.09344/) (2018)
- [Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.09699/) (2018)
- [Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.01320/) (2017)
- [Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.10829/) (2018)
- [Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08098/) (2018)
- [Branch and Bound for Piecewise Linear Neural Network Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06588/) (2019)
- [A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06567/) (2018)
- [Strong mixed-integer programming formulations for trained neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.08359/) (2018)
- [Training verified learners with learned verifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.10265/) (2018)
- [Improved Branch and Bound for Neural Network Verification via Lagrangian Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06718/) (2021)
- [Optimization and Abstraction: A Synergistic Approach for Analyzing Neural Network Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09959/) (2019)
- [Lagrangian Decomposition for Neural Network Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10410/) (2020)
- [Fast Neural Network Verification via Shadow Prices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07247/) (2019)
- [Cuts, Primal Heuristics, and Learning to Branch for the Time-Dependent Traveling Salesman Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01415/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [The Second International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2021): Summary and Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00498/) (2021)
- [The Third International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2022): Summary and Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10376/) (2022)
- [A Unified View of SDP-based Neural Network Verification through Completely Positive Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03034/) (2022)
- [Correctness Verification of Neural Networks Approximating Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07621/) (2024)
- [Specification Generation for Neural Networks in Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03028/) (2024)
- [Fast SDP certification of neural networks : towards large multi-class datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03232/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Many available formal verification methods have been shown to be instances of a unified Branch-and-Bound (BaB) formulation. We propose a novel machine learning framework that can be used for designing an effective branching strategy as well as for computing better lower bounds. Specifically, we learn two graph neural networks (GNN) that both directly treat the network we want to verify as a graph input and perform forward-backward passes through the GNN layers. We use one GNN to simulate the strong branching heuristic behaviour and another to compute a feasible dual solution of the convex relaxation, thereby providing a valid lower bound. We provide a new verification dataset that is more challenging than those used in the literature, thereby providing an effective alternative for testing algorithmic improvements for verification. Whilst using just one of the GNNs leads to a reduction in verification time, we get optimal performance when combining the two GNN approaches. Our combined framework achieves a 50% reduction in both the number of branches and the time required for verification on various convolutional networks when compared to several state-of-the-art verification methods. In addition, we show that our GNN models generalize well to harder properties on larger unseen networks.
