# Quantifying Network Similarity using Graph Cumulants

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11403 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.11403/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2021.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Quantifying Human Priors over Social and Navigation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18651/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

How might one test the hypothesis that networks were sampled from the same distribution? Here, we compare two statistical tests that use subgraph counts to address this question. The first uses the empirical subgraph densities themselves as estimates of those of the underlying distribution. The second test uses a new approach that converts these subgraph densities into estimates of the textitgraph cumulants of the distribution (without any increase in computational complexity). We demonstrate -- via theory, simulation, and application to real data -- the superior statistical power of using graph cumulants. In summary, when analyzing data using subgraph/motif densities, we suggest using the corresponding graph cumulants instead.
